1997
DOI: 10.1006/fmic.1996.0094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of microbial levels for incoming raw beef, environmental sources, and ground beef in a red meat processing plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
52
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…McMeekin e Thomas (1978) e Firstenberg-Eden, Notermans e Schothorst (1978), verificaram que as bactérias ficavam retidas na pele de frangos após a imersão das carcaças em suspensões bacterianas e esta retenção apresentava relação linear com as contagens bacterianas da suspensão.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…McMeekin e Thomas (1978) e Firstenberg-Eden, Notermans e Schothorst (1978), verificaram que as bactérias ficavam retidas na pele de frangos após a imersão das carcaças em suspensões bacterianas e esta retenção apresentava relação linear com as contagens bacterianas da suspensão.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…As contagens de CT e EC podem estimar falhas na higiene e indicar contaminação de origem fecal, sendo que elevadas contagens destes grupos de microrganismos podem estar relacionadas a níveis significativos de enteropatógenos, como a Salmonella spp. (JAY, 2000;EISEL;LINTON;MURIANA, 1997;McGINNIS;BADONI, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Moreover, evidence exists that inadequate hygiene practices within food processing plants may result in the contamination of product with pathogens (Metaxopoulos et al, 2003) and therefore pose a subsequent risk in the product"s safety. On the other hand, complete elimination of pathogens from raw materials (Eisel et al, 1997) and food processing environment (Tompkin, 2012) is difficult, particularly when many food pathogenic are known to be able to attach on food contact surfaces (FonnesbechVogel et al, 2001;Jessen and Lammert, 2009;Deza et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the World Health Organization (WHO 2008), E. coli Type 1 is the indicator organism of choice for faecal pollution, the analysis is simple and affordable and levels of contamination can be quantified by counting colony forming units (cfu). Abattoirs are required to test for generic E. coli on carcasses to verify that they are preventing faecal contamination from carcasses during and after slaughter (Buzby and Crutchfield 1997;Eisel et al 1997). The E. coli count tests for the presence of harmless indicator organisms that indicate the presence of pathogenic intestinal organisms such as velogenic E. coli strains, Salmonella spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and C. jejuni. The presence of faecal contamination is an indicator that a potential health risk exists for individuals exposed to food or water with high coliform counts (Eisel et al 1997). According to Codex (1997), the microbiological limits should take into consideration the risk associated with the microorganisms, and the conditions under which the food is expected to be handled and consumed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%