2020
DOI: 10.1145/3408316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Ontologies for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping in Mobile Robots

Abstract: Autonomous robots are playing important roles in academic, technological, and scientific activities. Thus, their behavior is getting more complex, particularly, in tasks related to mapping an environment and localizing themselves. These tasks comprise the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem. Representation of knowledge related to the SLAM problem with a standard, flexible, and well-defined model, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. As many existing works demonst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SLAM domain experts also act as a source and support for conceptualization, since they provide their terminology. Section 2 and the previous work presented in [7], reflect some results of this familiarization phase.…”
Section: Context Familiarizationmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SLAM domain experts also act as a source and support for conceptualization, since they provide their terminology. Section 2 and the previous work presented in [7], reflect some results of this familiarization phase.…”
Section: Context Familiarizationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For example, despite using different techniques or sensors, robots can store and share the knowledge acquired with the same ontology: an aerial robot in a 3D spatial scenario could share the location of features with a terrestrial robot in a 2D spatial scenario. Some studies have formulated ontologies to partially model the information related to some aspects of SLAM, as shown in the studies presented in [6,7], that propose a categorization of the knowledge domain of SLAM and compare state-of-the-art SLAM ontologies. Those studies show that most SLAM ontologies are focused on the knowledge related to the SLAM final result (i.e., the maps) and considering the SLAM problem as a static process [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EMONTO can be extended with other specific domain ontologies representing entities with which the emotion can be related. The detected emotion can be used for many purposes, such as accordingly designing the reactions and actions of robots or combining the semantic information of emotions with other ontologies related to a robot鈥檚 tasks (e.g., SLAM (Simultaneous Localization And Mapping), navigation, and perception) [ 16 ] or with domain-specific ontologies related to the environment where robots work (e.g., museums, restaurants, and hospitals) [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLAM deals with the necessity of building a map of an environment, while simultaneously determining the location of the robot within this map. In a previous study (Cornejo et al, 2020b), we surveyed the most popular and recent SLAM ontologies, classifying them according to the type of knowledge modeled. In this work, we evaluate and compare them, including our proposed ontology for SLAM (OntoSLAM), following our extended methodological process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%