2001
DOI: 10.1080/14038190120851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Physiotherapists' Current Practice with Closed Suction Systems in Adult Patients

Abstract: returned a postal questionnaire. These which require further research or education. This retrospective survey was carried demonstrated a wide variation in practice, some of which is of concern. Pracout to establish the current practice of tice and theory do not appear to mirror KEY WORDS: Intensive care -physiorespiratory physiotherapists with closed suction. Seventy-eigh t physiotherapists each other and issues are identi ed therapy -questionnaire.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8 Such limitations result in lowquality evidence that is of limited clinical value. Surveys have indicated that NSI has been used extensively with patients requiring suction; [11][12][13] 39% of physiotherapists and 43% of respiratory therapists in Canada have reported using it routinely, and 46% and 51% respectively have reported using it sometimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Such limitations result in lowquality evidence that is of limited clinical value. Surveys have indicated that NSI has been used extensively with patients requiring suction; [11][12][13] 39% of physiotherapists and 43% of respiratory therapists in Canada have reported using it routinely, and 46% and 51% respectively have reported using it sometimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section will discuss the key findings in relation to the research questions and available literature. suction has been described in adult intensive care (Cross, 2001, Ntoumenopoulos et al, 2018 and closed suction in PICU demonstrated equivalent rates of adverse events and no differences in the incidence of ventilator acquired pneumonia (Evans et al, 2014, Morrow et al, 2012. In a paediatric intensive care model using an animal research laboratory, CS was less effective than OS at removing thin and thick secretions in injured lung (Copnell et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%