1992
DOI: 10.1090/conm/125/1160620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of prophet inequalities in optimal stopping theory

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This paper surveys the origin and development of what has come to be known as "prophet inequalities" in optimal stopping theory. Included is a review of all published work to date on these problems, in cl uding extensions and variations, descriptions and examples of the main proof techniques, and a list of a number of basic open problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an extensive literature on prophet inequalities, part of which is surveyed in Hill and Kertz (1992). The more recent survey of Hartline (2012) studies specifically prophet inequalities obtained by simple algorithms like ours.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an extensive literature on prophet inequalities, part of which is surveyed in Hill and Kertz (1992). The more recent survey of Hartline (2012) studies specifically prophet inequalities obtained by simple algorithms like ours.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Note that some notion of independence assumption is necessary as even for the single choice problem, if values are arbitrarily correlated then every online algorithm is Ω(n) competitive [35]. 2 In fact, for general downward-closed constraint, even with additive valuations one should not expect efficient algorithms with membership queries [45].…”
Section: Theorem 13 (Monotone Subadditivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a classical prophet problem, the expected return of a prophet, who has complete foresight into the future, is compared with paper by Hill and Kertz [9]. A more recent overview is the book by Harten et al [6], along with its revised and translated version by Schmitz [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%