2008
DOI: 10.1080/13651500701330916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of psychiatrists’ attitudes to schizoaffective disorder

Abstract: Objective. Schizoaffective disorder is an established diagnosis in both ICD-10 and DSM-IV, but research evidence relating to its nosological status and aetiology is conflicting. This study aimed to examine the attitudes of practising consultant psychiatrists, and to see whether there is a consensus about its classification and value in everyday clinical psychiatry. Method. A questionnaire was mailed to 2000 consultant psychiatrists drawn randomly from the membership list of the Royal College of Psychiatrists i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Categorical diagnoses increase the vulnerability of clinical psychiatry to these complications, and this chimes with the current nosological debate about the relationship between schizophrenia, schizo affective disorder and mood disorders, which has been revived from a genetic base (Craddock 2005) and which is perhaps supported by the limited research into clinical practice (Rowe 2008). Psychiatrists should be aware of these potential theoretical and clinical problems, not just in relation to homicide-suicide and infanticide, but also in relation to less catastrophic violence and broader antisocial behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Categorical diagnoses increase the vulnerability of clinical psychiatry to these complications, and this chimes with the current nosological debate about the relationship between schizophrenia, schizo affective disorder and mood disorders, which has been revived from a genetic base (Craddock 2005) and which is perhaps supported by the limited research into clinical practice (Rowe 2008). Psychiatrists should be aware of these potential theoretical and clinical problems, not just in relation to homicide-suicide and infanticide, but also in relation to less catastrophic violence and broader antisocial behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a survey of 2,000 clinicians, Rowe and Clark [43] found that 77.8% agreed that SZA was a ‘useful diagnosis'. Genetic differences have also been noted between SZA and SZ [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may suggest that the schizoaffective group requires a different level of service compared to both the affective and non-affective patients. This may provide some preliminary support for the use for the schizoaffective diagnosis, in spite of the current controversy (Rowe and Clark 2008). This lack of assurance and responsiveness may indicate that clinicians do not fully understand how to reassure and act empathetic towards patients who exhibit symptoms that have an uncertain relationship to both schizophrenia and mood disorders (Rowe and Clark 2008).…”
Section: Dimensional Approach To Inpatient Expectations and Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 96%