2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of quantum-like approaches to decision making and cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(135 reference statements)
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantum-like account of the conjunction fallacy is particularly promising as it belongs to a more general theoretical framework of quantum-like modeling in cognition and decision making, which has been applied to many fallacies or human behavior considered as irrational (for reviews, see Pothos and Busemeyer 2013;Ashtiani andAzgomi 2015, or Bruza et al 2015; textbooks include Busemeyer and Bruza 2012;Haven and Khrennikov 2013). For instance, quantum-like models of judgments have been proposed to account for order effect, i. e. when the answers given to two questions depend on the order of presentation of these questions (Atmanspacher and Römer 2012;Busemeyer and Bruza 2012;Wang and Busemeyer 2013;Wang et al 2014); for the violation of the sure thing principle, which states that if an agent prefers choosing action A-B under a specific state of the world and also prefers choosing A-B in the complementary state, then she should choose A over B regardless of the state of the world (Busemeyer et al 2006a, b;Busemeyer and Wang 2007;Khrennikov and Haven 2009; for Ellsberg's paradox (Ellsberg 1961) more specifically, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum-like account of the conjunction fallacy is particularly promising as it belongs to a more general theoretical framework of quantum-like modeling in cognition and decision making, which has been applied to many fallacies or human behavior considered as irrational (for reviews, see Pothos and Busemeyer 2013;Ashtiani andAzgomi 2015, or Bruza et al 2015; textbooks include Busemeyer and Bruza 2012;Haven and Khrennikov 2013). For instance, quantum-like models of judgments have been proposed to account for order effect, i. e. when the answers given to two questions depend on the order of presentation of these questions (Atmanspacher and Römer 2012;Busemeyer and Bruza 2012;Wang and Busemeyer 2013;Wang et al 2014); for the violation of the sure thing principle, which states that if an agent prefers choosing action A-B under a specific state of the world and also prefers choosing A-B in the complementary state, then she should choose A over B regardless of the state of the world (Busemeyer et al 2006a, b;Busemeyer and Wang 2007;Khrennikov and Haven 2009; for Ellsberg's paradox (Ellsberg 1961) more specifically, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generality of our framework, being equally suitable for quantum measurements and decision making, is its principal difference from all other attempts that employ quantum techniques in psychological sciences. An extensive literature on various quantum models in psychology and cognitive science can be found in the books [8][9][10][11] and review articles [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, following the brief introduction given by Ashtiani and Azgomi (2015) and Busemeyer (2009) presented in (Bruza et al 2009), concerning the understanding of behavioural measures based on quantum probability principles, quantum theory could be employed as an alternative mathematical method for generating probability models.…”
Section: Quantum Theory and Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of quantum theory's mathematical modelling to human decision making and cognition does not necessarily imply that the human brain is considered to have a quantum nature. Consequently, these approaches are usually referred to as quantum-like instead of quantum mechanical or quantum, (Ashtiani and Azgomi 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%