2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5bm00085h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of state-of-the-art surface chemistries to minimize fouling from human and animal biofluids

Abstract: Upon contact with bodily fluids, synthetic materials spontaneously acquire a layer of various species (most notably proteins) on their surface. The concern with respect to biomedical equipment, implants or devices resides in the possibility for biological processes with potentially harmful effects to ensue. In biosensor technology, the issue with this natural fouling phenomenon is that of non-specific adsorption to sensing platforms, which generates an often overwhelming interference signal that prevents the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 258 publications
(873 reference statements)
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Excellent fouling resistance has been recently reported for ultra‐low fouling polymer brushes 2. Examples include nonionic poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(3‐hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly( N ‐(2‐hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (pHPMAA), zwitterionic poly(carboxybetaine)‐based (pCB) brushes such as poly(carboxybetaine methacrylamide) (pCBMAA) and poly(carboxybetaine acrylamide) (pCBAA), or recently developed random copolymers combining zwitterionic and nonionic moieties such as p(CBMAA‐ co ‐HPMAA) 1,2,5,6. These platforms are characterized by diverse physicochemical surface properties including structure, architecture, thickness, rigidity, wettability, surface charge, packing density, or swelling properties; all of these parameters have been shown to have an impact on resulting surface resistance to fouling from complex media and biological activity of immobilized biorecognition elements 5,7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Excellent fouling resistance has been recently reported for ultra‐low fouling polymer brushes 2. Examples include nonionic poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(3‐hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly( N ‐(2‐hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (pHPMAA), zwitterionic poly(carboxybetaine)‐based (pCB) brushes such as poly(carboxybetaine methacrylamide) (pCBMAA) and poly(carboxybetaine acrylamide) (pCBAA), or recently developed random copolymers combining zwitterionic and nonionic moieties such as p(CBMAA‐ co ‐HPMAA) 1,2,5,6. These platforms are characterized by diverse physicochemical surface properties including structure, architecture, thickness, rigidity, wettability, surface charge, packing density, or swelling properties; all of these parameters have been shown to have an impact on resulting surface resistance to fouling from complex media and biological activity of immobilized biorecognition elements 5,7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2,5,6] These platforms are characterized by diverse physicochemical surface properties including structure, architecture, thickness, rigidity, wettability, surface charge, packing density, or swelling properties; all of these parameters have been shown to have an impact on resulting surface resistance to fouling from complex media and biological activity of immobilized biorecognition elements. [5,7] Therefore, it is expected that these factors may also significantly influence behavior of living cells in the proximity of such coatings. In fact, when the cells are seeded on such surfaces, the coatings will act as an analogue of extracellular matrix and thus will have a substantial impact on cells, conveying physical and chemical stimuli, and influencing cellular shape, actin cytoskeleton organization, and transcription activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other challenge is the nonspecific adsorption from the serum 13,14 . Although many works have focused on developing anti-fouling immunosensor substrates 15 , the non-specific adsorption still haunts in practice and its interference cannot be eliminated completely in the serological detection 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, the key problem in the analysis of clinically relevant samples by plasmonic biosensors is the fouling of their metallic surface with tethered ligands for specific capture of target analyte. 19,20 To solve this problem, research in surface chemistries and architectures was pursued to decrease or completely eliminate the adverse effect of fouling and thereby maximize the efficiency. The most widely used surface modifications are based on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), for example, self-assembled monolayers (SAM) terminated with short oligoethylene glycol (OEG).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%