2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023gl104989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Strong Electric Potential Drops in the Ionosphere of Venus

Glyn A. Collinson,
Rudy A. Frahm,
Alex Glocer
et al.

Abstract: Every planet or moon with an ionosphere is thought to generate a weak electrical potential which helps ions overcome gravity and escape to space. A pilot study at Venus by Collinson et al. (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068327) indicated a planetary potential an order of magnitude stronger than expected. Here we present a statistical study of the electrical potential drop in the ionosphere of Venus, which was found to be an average of 7.04 ± 2.19 V. However, these strong potentials measured by Venus Expr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inferred ambipolar potential at Mars with this method is around 0.7 V on the dayside and up to 1.5 V in the tail, similar to previous results (Akbari et al, 2019). At Venus, the inferred potential is much larger, up to 10 V, by Collinson et al (2016), but a follow-up study by Collinson et al (2023) concludes that these large potentials are likely atypical and extreme outliers associated with a transient phenomenon in the Venusian ionosphere. It is also worth mentioning that the ambipolar potential and electric field are derived within the Mars magnetosphere by Xu, Mitchell, et al (2021), mainly resulting from the electron pressure gradient between the hot sheath flow and the cold planetary flow.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inferred ambipolar potential at Mars with this method is around 0.7 V on the dayside and up to 1.5 V in the tail, similar to previous results (Akbari et al, 2019). At Venus, the inferred potential is much larger, up to 10 V, by Collinson et al (2016), but a follow-up study by Collinson et al (2023) concludes that these large potentials are likely atypical and extreme outliers associated with a transient phenomenon in the Venusian ionosphere. It is also worth mentioning that the ambipolar potential and electric field are derived within the Mars magnetosphere by Xu, Mitchell, et al (2021), mainly resulting from the electron pressure gradient between the hot sheath flow and the cold planetary flow.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The ambipolar electric field and the associated ambipolar potential ( U A ) have been derived from the measured thermal (<1 eV) electron density and temperature for Mars (Akbari et al., 2019; Ergun et al., 2016) and Venus (Collinson et al., 2016), with a magnitude of order | E A |∼ 0.1 − 1 mV/km and U A ∼ − 1 V (relative to the ionospheric production region) at both planets. Alternatively, the ambipolar potential has been derived from the energy shift of the He‐II peak in the ionospheric photoelectron energy spectrum at Mars (Xu, Mitchell, et al., 2018) and Venus (Collinson et al., 2016, 2023). As the He‐II peak is produced by the 30.4 nm solar He‐II emission line, the corresponding flux peak in the photoelectron energy spectrum is fixed at 23–37 eV (the excessive photon energy above the photoionization potential) at production and can be shifted to different energies by ambient plasma potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation