2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23074-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Structured P2P Systems for RDF Data Storage and Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most systems [7,14,20] construct a data summary of neighboring nodes or clusters to make a query forwarding decisions. Some algorithms exchange these filters between nodes to maintain their network [11].…”
Section: Query Evaluation With Approximate Membershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most systems [7,14,20] construct a data summary of neighboring nodes or clusters to make a query forwarding decisions. Some algorithms exchange these filters between nodes to maintain their network [11].…”
Section: Query Evaluation With Approximate Membershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the Hungarian algorithm can be applied to get the optimal chunk scheduling. Formally, the assignment problem (2) can be rewritten into the following assignment problem: be an optimal solution to the assignment problem (5), then k ij R is an optimal solution to the mcardinality assignment problem (2).…”
Section: Nodes' Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They placed a strong emphasis in preserving some level of peer independence, and adapting gracefully to peers and/or datasets joining, respectively, leaving the network, which in turn complicates the application's resilience to failures, and maintaining some level of service. A survey on P2P-based RDF data management can be found in [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%