1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1973.tb06804.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Tapeworms in Rural Dogs in Tasmania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Worms were collected from arecoline induced purges as previously described (Gregory 1973). E. granulosus and D. caninum were identified on the testing strips but Taenia spp were submitted without preservation to a central laboratory for identification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Worms were collected from arecoline induced purges as previously described (Gregory 1973). E. granulosus and D. caninum were identified on the testing strips but Taenia spp were submitted without preservation to a central laboratory for identification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Tasmania Taenia spp were not identified until 1969 and the results of an initial survey of tapeworms from dogs from all rural areas during 1969-71 were reported by Gregory (1973). This communication reports the annual results of a continuing survey of Taenia spp in rural dogs in Tasmania from 1969-70 to 1974-75 during the Hydatid Limitation Program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress in control was monitored using the taeniafuge arecoline hydrobromide as a diagnostic agent, the best available method of diagnosis of canine echinococcosis although one of relatively poor sensitivity. Under field conditions in New Zealand and Australia, arecoline hydrobromide failed to purge more than a fifth of the dogs dosed with 3-5 mg/kg body weight (Gemmell, 1958(Gemmell, , 1968Jackson & Arundel, 1971;Gregory, 1973 Another factor that reduced the accuracy of the prevalence data was the introduction of alternative methods of administration of arecoline hydrobromide. Forbes (1961) demonstrated that, in dogs failing to respond to oral dosing, the purgative efficiency of arecoline was improved by the subsequent use of arecoline enemata.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of E. granulosus in dogs was measured using the taeniafuge arecoline hydrobromide as a diagnostic agent, the best available method of diagnosis of canine echinococcosis although one of poor sensitivity. Under field conditions in New Zealand and Australia, arecoline hydrobromide failed to purge more than a fifth of the dogsdosedwith 35mg/kg body weight (Gemmell, 1958(Gemmell, ,1968Jackson & Arundel, 1971;Gregory, 1973). Even when purgation was induced, some infected dogs retained their worm burdens (Gemmell, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%