1995
DOI: 10.1137/1037043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of the Maximum Principles for Optimal Control Problems with State Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
543
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 800 publications
(546 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
543
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The next proposition is due to Jacobson et al [20]. Its proof was later clarified in Maurer [28], see also the survey by Hartl et al [16].…”
Section: Junction Condition Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The next proposition is due to Jacobson et al [20]. Its proof was later clarified in Maurer [28], see also the survey by Hartl et al [16].…”
Section: Junction Condition Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus we may extend continuously DJ(u) and DG(u) over L 2 (0, T ) (we keep the same notations for the extensions). Since DG(u) : L 2 (0, T ) → C[0, T ], it makes sense to extend the critical cone C(u) defined in (16) to critical directions in L 2 , as follows:…”
Section: Extended Second-order Necessary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in [12], the optimality conditions derived here are based on the so-called direct approach (see [9]). However, the necessary conditions in [12] contain the conditions (20) but not the condition (19).…”
Section: Discussion Of the New Necessary Optimality Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimality conditions in [2,16] are formulated based on an so-called indirect approach (see [9]), which a priori leads to weaker results compared with the direct approach.…”
Section: Discussion Of the New Necessary Optimality Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the augmented objective obtained through the direct adjoining method [11], and * x and * u denote the optimal solutions corresponding to a specified parameter a. Note that the sensitivity given by Rehbock et al [9] is a special case of (17).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%