2008
DOI: 10.1002/jmr.859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of the year 2006 literature on applications of isothermal titration calorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 418 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BC-box protein had slightly lower affinity (K d  = 2.2 µM), but the ΔPPL protein displayed an affinity similar to the wild type (1.25 µM). This suggests that the modest but reproducible affinity decrease measured for the BC-box protein may not be a specific effect of binding, but rather may reflect size-related properties of the truncation, possibly related to the diffusion rate in solution [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The BC-box protein had slightly lower affinity (K d  = 2.2 µM), but the ΔPPL protein displayed an affinity similar to the wild type (1.25 µM). This suggests that the modest but reproducible affinity decrease measured for the BC-box protein may not be a specific effect of binding, but rather may reflect size-related properties of the truncation, possibly related to the diffusion rate in solution [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[1][2][3][4] The underlying principle is simple: the system at hand, for instance, a macromolecular solution, is titrated by small aliquots of a titrant such as a ligand solution while the temperature of the system is maintained constant. The heat supplied to or removed from the system upon each addition is recorded as being the heat effect associated with the titrant addition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isothermal titration calorimetry can be used to measure the kinetics and thermodynamic constants of a binding reaction Ladbury, 2006, 2007;Okhrimenko et al, 2008). It can be seen from the kinetic results that the binding strengths of OA and LA to β-LG were similar, even though there were more binding sites for OA on β-LG than there were for LA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%