A survey of transposable element classification systems – A call for a fundamental update to meet the challenge of their diversity and complexity

Piégu, Benoît; Bire, Solenne; Arensburger, Peter; Bigot, Yves

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.009

Cited by 138 publications

(135 citation statements)

References 133 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

135

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, we proposed that this definition needs to be broadened to "TEs are discrete segments of DNA capable of moving within a host genome from one chromosome or plasmid location to another, or between hosts by using parasitic vectors that they use for lateral transfers." 3 An important aspect of this definition is that it includes mobile DNA sequences that are primarily maintained by vertical transmission as copies integrated into the chromosomes or plasmids of their hosts. Therefore, according to this definition, while viruses, phages, and integrative conjugative elements (ICE) have similar features to TEs, they are not considered to be TEs because they are able to move between hosts independently of transmission vectors.…”

Section: A Definition Of Tesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on out findings we concluded that 1) the basal dichotomy view of the TE world advocated by Finnegan is no longer justified by modern science, 2) the Curcio and Derbyshire view appears to us to fit the current science best, but requires careful attention to evolutionary convergences at the molecular level, and 3) the addition of several new TE classes and orders are necessary to keep up with recent discoveries in this field. 3 In Table 1 we outline our proposal for a new taxonomic scheme which has the advantage of allowing the integrating new classes, new orders and new-families, such as the recently described Casposons. 26,27 However, using the same standards as we have applied to previous taxonomic proposal we recognize that our scheme is deficient in several respects.…”

Section: Rationale For Revisiting the Taxonomy Of Tesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The criteria used are indicated in italics just below the levels of Class, Order and Superfamilies. Bibliographic references of updated points with respect to the previous version 3 are indicated. Late in the preparation of this manuscript, on October 19 th 2016, it was reported 34 that two Introner-like elements occurring respectively in the genomes of two unicellular algae, the prasinophyte Micromonas pusilla and the pelagophyte Aureococcus anophagefferensare, are not TEs with a non-LTR retrotransposon phenotype, but are MITEs related each to a species of DDE-transposons for which the families remain to be identified.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent publications (see discussions in refs. 3,4 ) reflect these views and it is time for the TE community to reexamine the bases upon which its science is organized. We call for the emergence of an international society for the biology of TEs to address these questions by including all the voices in the community, it is time for the "Lion and Rat.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics - what we can learn from the fables of Jean de la Fontaine?

Arensburger

Piégu

Bigot

2016

Mobile Genetic Elements

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transposable element (TE) science has been significantly influenced by the pioneering ideas of David Finnegan near the end of the last century, as well as by the classification systems that were subsequently developed. Today, whole genome TE annotation is mostly done using tools that were developed to aid gene annotation rather than to specifically study TEs. We argue that further progress in the TE field is impeded both by current TE classification schemes and by a failure to recognize that TE biology is fundamentally different from that of multicellular organisms. Novel genome wide TE annotation methods are helping to redefine our understanding of TE sequence origins and evolution. We briefly discuss some of these new methods as well as ideas for possible alternative classification schemes. Our hope is to encourage the formation of a society to organize a larger debate on these questions and to promote the adoption of standards for annotation and an improved TE classification. KEYWORDS genome; mobile genetic element; ontology; repeat; taxonomy Jean de la Fontaine, the most famous of the French poets of the seventeenth century, is well known for his fables involving animal protagonists that examine the organization of human society. Among these the "Wolf and Lamb" 1 and the "Lion and Rat" 2 describe 2 views of human society that may be summarized respectively as "might makes right" and "even the smallest can help the greater." In scientific circles sometimes it is the most powerful members of the community that dictate the dominant ideas in the field, "might makes right," which is an efficient system but often comes at the expense of collegiality. Alternatively, some scientific communities emphasize input from all members, along the lines of the second fable, but this comes at a cost of time to allow for contradictory debates. Communities in this second category often form societies where elected representatives organize the flow of information within the community and set procedures for making scientific decisions on the future of the field. We argue that the field of eukaryotic transposable elements (TEs) is currently organized around several concepts that are championed by a minority and accepted without argument by a majority. These concepts include what the nature of a TE is, how TEs are identified in assembled genomes, and how they are classified taxonomically. Recent publications (see discussions in refs. 3,4 ) reflect these views and it is time for the TE community to reexamine the bases upon which its science is organized. We call for the emergence of an international society for the biology of TEs to address these questions by including all the voices in the community, it is time for the "Lion and Rat." A definition of TEsHaren et al.5 defined TEs as "discrete segments of DNA capable of moving from one locus to another in their host genome or between different genomes." Recently, we proposed that this definition needs to be broadened to "TEs are discrete segments of DNA capable of moving withi...

show abstract

Section: A Definition Of Tesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Rationale For Revisiting the Taxonomy Of Tesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics - what we can learn from the fables of Jean de la Fontaine?

Arensburger

Piégu

Bigot

2016

Mobile Genetic Elements

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such community efforts of standardization should also take into account suggestions for a revised classification system, one which better incorporates the diversity of archaeal, bacterial and eukaryotic forms of mobile genetic elements, and based more upon the divergent phylogenetic lineages of these elements (Piégu et al 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%