2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2011.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of ward nurses attitudes to the Intensive Care Nurse Consultant service in a teaching hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), prioritise clinical issues and coordinate multiple facets of patient care (McIntyre et al . ). These findings also strengthen earlier findings related to seeing the bigger picture (Benner , Sørensen & Hall ) and transcending traditional expectations and obstacles (Kucera et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…), prioritise clinical issues and coordinate multiple facets of patient care (McIntyre et al . ). These findings also strengthen earlier findings related to seeing the bigger picture (Benner , Sørensen & Hall ) and transcending traditional expectations and obstacles (Kucera et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…CNC/CMC interventions are reported to have significant impact on patient outcomes (Redfern , McIntyre et al . ) and service delivery (Guest et al . , Austin et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each study developed a new local survey tool to address specific study aims except one, which used a locally modified version of a previously developed tool (Beebe et al., ). Only four referenced other work to inform the development or administration of the instrument (McIntyre et al., ; Pusateri, Prior, & Kiely, ; Rotella, Yu, Ferguson, & Jones, ; Stevens et al., ). While all studies reported that the newly developed surveys had pretesting prior to distribution, none provided any convincing evidence of instrument reliability or validity.…”
Section: Quality Appraisal Of Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, no papers provided sufficient information for replication of data analysis methods. Only three noted steps for handling missing data (Jones et al., ; McIntyre et al., ; Pusateri et al., ; Rotella et al., ), two described how data entry was verified (Jones et al., ; Pusateri et al., ), and one explained response rate calculations (Rotella et al., ). None explained approaches for analysis of nonresponse error, or provided definitions for complete vs. partially completed surveys.…”
Section: Quality Appraisal Of Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%