2021 5th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer Technologies and Optimization Techniques 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iceeccot52851.2021.9707947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Affective Computing for Psychological Emotion Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process is initiated by reading the AMIGOS dataset, in which the physiological signals are considered. The data was collected from 40 participants the exposure to 20 unique videos [17]. The preprocessed physiological data such as ECG, EEG, and GSR contain the unique reflection points gathered from the participants during the Video exposure.…”
Section: Methodology 31 System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process is initiated by reading the AMIGOS dataset, in which the physiological signals are considered. The data was collected from 40 participants the exposure to 20 unique videos [17]. The preprocessed physiological data such as ECG, EEG, and GSR contain the unique reflection points gathered from the participants during the Video exposure.…”
Section: Methodology 31 System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…shows the Self-Assessment manikins chart for Violence, arousal and dominance. [24] SAM tool consists of an affective slider designed to represent the pictorial representation of pleasure on the top row, arousal in the middle row, and further dominance on the bottom scale is defined. During the emotion analysis process, the participants are allowed to make a marking in the chart shown above to make them self-assess the exposed inputs.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] the author used the Conventional LSTM model and achieved an accuracy of 82% on affective computing. Liu, et al, (2022) [24] discussed the Deep Convolution Neural Network for affect state analysis and achieved an accuracy of 92.5%. From the table above, the proposed EmoNet_ANN (ENA) model achieved an accuracy of 92.95% with multiple parameters with reduced computations.…”
Section: Error Histogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithm is proposed for multi-label learning to aid in investigating emotional effects in several modalities. Diverse modality scenarios allow the emotional effect components to be investigated from several perspectives regarding the primary polarity of happy and sad emotions [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%