2011
DOI: 10.1186/1687-417x-2011-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey on biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics

Abstract: Form a privacy perspective most concerns against the common use of biometrics arise from the storage and misuse of biometric data. Biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics represent emerging technologies of biometric template protection addressing these concerns and improving public confidence and acceptance of biometrics. In addition, biometric cryptosystems provide mechanisms for biometric-dependent key-release. In the last years a significant amount of approaches to both technologies have been publ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
348
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 505 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
(286 reference statements)
0
348
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, any template protection approach should allow to revoke a biometric data in case of interception, and should be carefully designed, with a strong security analysis. Among the different solutions in the literature, template protection can be achieved using biometric cryptosystems [15], [14], [9], [20] or by transforming the biometric feature data [22], [5], [25], [23]. As detailed in the next section, BioHashing is one popular scheme that belongs to this second category and allows to revoke a biometric template.…”
Section: Proposed Authentication Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, any template protection approach should allow to revoke a biometric data in case of interception, and should be carefully designed, with a strong security analysis. Among the different solutions in the literature, template protection can be achieved using biometric cryptosystems [15], [14], [9], [20] or by transforming the biometric feature data [22], [5], [25], [23]. As detailed in the next section, BioHashing is one popular scheme that belongs to this second category and allows to revoke a biometric template.…”
Section: Proposed Authentication Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is pursued to fix the definition of metrics for measuring irreversibility, secrecy, and unlinkability and to devise methods for empirical evaluation of these metrics. The template protection schemes proposed in literatures can be broadly classified into two categories, feature transformation approach and biometric cryptosystem [2], [3]. The former [4]- [16] has a high degree of freedom for signal processing in the protected domain, compared to the latter [17]- [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this paper is not to propose a new scheme for biometric template protection. For more details on these schemes, we refer the reader to the detailed survey [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%