2016 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icaccs.2016.7586371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey on classification techniques for text mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly due to the problem of ambiguity in natural languages. The issues like Polysemy (one word-multiple meanings) and synonymy (multiple words-similar meaning) are two prominent issues in text mining (Brindha et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is mainly due to the problem of ambiguity in natural languages. The issues like Polysemy (one word-multiple meanings) and synonymy (multiple words-similar meaning) are two prominent issues in text mining (Brindha et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also difficult to process every bit of data manually and classify them clearly. This led to the emergence of intelligent tools in text processing, in the field of natural language processing, to analyze lexical and linguistic patterns (Brindha et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This algorithm concentrate on specific features of the document to be classified [8]. It is effective and easy to implement [18] and also the most accepted algorithms for pattern recognition [16].…”
Section: K-nearest Neighbormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naive Bayes algorithm is one of classification technique that makes exploit of statistical approach and based on the conditional probabilities for the problems of pattern recognition [16]. Naive Bayes uses Bayes Theorem concept [15][16] [18] with strong independence assumptions.…”
Section: Naive Bayesmentioning
confidence: 99%