2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2202.02215
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation -- A Methodological Perspective

Abstract: Autonomous driving systems have witnessed a significant development during the past years thanks to the advance in machine learning-enabled sensing and decision-making algorithms. One critical challenge for their massive deployment in the real world is their safety evaluation. Most existing driving systems are still trained and evaluated on naturalistic scenarios collected from daily life or heuristically-generated adversarial ones. However, the large population of cars, in general, leads to an extremely low c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(155 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scenarios faced by UAS in reality are relatively complex, with many error-caused factors, and the parameter values of the factor are continuous scalars. [9]Assumed the distribution of scenario x is parameterized with , the error-caused scenario can be represented by formula (4).…”
Section: Distribution Of Error-caused Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scenarios faced by UAS in reality are relatively complex, with many error-caused factors, and the parameter values of the factor are continuous scalars. [9]Assumed the distribution of scenario x is parameterized with , the error-caused scenario can be represented by formula (4).…”
Section: Distribution Of Error-caused Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalized value of the error-caused factors in the scenarios represents the error-caused level of the scenario, and the measurement formula is shown in formula (9).…”
Section: Measurement Of Error-caused Level In Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second limitation is that most of the benchmarks use pre-defined tasks and parameters set by the creators, which lacks diversity and may be subject to human biases. Last but not least, although tasks are usually randomly sampled, the distribution rarely triggers critical events with catastrophic consequences, resulting in an underestimation of risks and very slow convergence of the results [40]. Some recent benchmarks [199] use realistic 3D simulators to construct real-world scenarios and use accelerated evaluation methods [10,204] to emphasize the rare safety-critical cases.…”
Section: How To Design Evaluation Platforms For Trustworthy Rl?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third kinds do not optimize the likelihood but use the game theory to find an equilibrium point between a generative model and a discriminator. A good review is provided in [43].…”
Section: Constructing D N1 With Dangerous Scenario Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%