2008 Second International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (Sensorcomm 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/sensorcomm.2008.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Sensor Webs Simulation Tools

Abstract: Currently, few real sensor web applications are being explored and some of them are yet to come. Meanwhile, developing and deploying prototypes in order to analyze the sensor web performance supposes a great effort. Consequently, simulation is fundamental to study sensor webs, and is being the common way to test new applications and protocols in this evolving research field. This fact has brought a recent growing number of simulation tools available to model sensor webs. In this paper, we provide background on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhu (2012) introduced and assessed the coverage and connectivity features of popular USN simulation tools. Mekni and Moulin (2008) provided background on a number of different sensor web simulation tools along with the advantages and the drawbacks of each. Accordingly, they proposed an evaluation methodology in order to assess the capabilities of each simulation tool.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhu (2012) introduced and assessed the coverage and connectivity features of popular USN simulation tools. Mekni and Moulin (2008) provided background on a number of different sensor web simulation tools along with the advantages and the drawbacks of each. Accordingly, they proposed an evaluation methodology in order to assess the capabilities of each simulation tool.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section, therefore, introduces 130 USN simulation and emulation environments and frameworks, as well as their derivatives, which were originally designed and adapted for USN. The USN simulators and emulators provided in the following are the ones that we found in the literature at (Neves et al, 2007) NS-2, J-Sim, SENSE USN application in medicine, overview, and comparison (Mekni and Moulin, 2008) NS-2, OPNET, OMNeT++, J-Sim, NCTUns, JiST/SWANS, GloMoSim, SSFNet, TOSSIM, TOSSF, TYTHON, EmStar/EmSim/ EmTOS, ATEMU, SENSE, SENS, Prowler/JProwler, ModelNet/ Nisnet, SwarmNet/Shawn, Glonemo, Avrora…”
Section: Overview Of Usn Simulators and Emulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insight on pre-deployment tools general to embedded systems have been discussed [71]. We therefore reflect here on the efficacy of post-deployment techniques for detecting failures, providing insights specific to LowPANs.…”
Section: A Tools and Failure Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to simulation tools, which have been previously classified in [3], [4], [5], a universal taxonomy of testbeds has not been established, largely due to the diversity of features these testbeds offer. Testbeds are typically assigned to one or more of the following classes: general-purpose or applicationspecific, indoor or outdoor, and mobile or stationary.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%