2021
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey on server-based electronic identification and signature schemes to improve eIDAS: with a new proposal for Turkey

Abstract: The design, development, and implementation of e-Government applications aim to improve the quality of daily life and facilitate the mobility of citizens by reducing the constraints imposed by existing borders. This study examines previous research in the literature on electronic identification (eID) credentials technologies and the projects carried out in Europe. This study focuses especially on server-based e-signing methods. In the light of these reviews, the applicability of a server-based mobile electroni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, where a Member State offers its citizens certain online services requiring electronic identification, that Member State must also recognise, for the purposes of cross-border identification, the electronic identification methods (options) established in another Member State (Cirlig 2016). This view is shared by Erdogan and Saran (2021), pointing out that the mutual recognition obligation is limited to those electronic identification means that meet the requirements set out in Article 6 of the eIDAS Regulation (included in the list published by the Commission, assurance level equal to or higher). According to Berbecaru et al (2019), the first precondition that an electronic identification means must fulfil in order to be recognised on the territory of another Member State is a sufficient level of guarantee for that means, which must be at least significant or high.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, where a Member State offers its citizens certain online services requiring electronic identification, that Member State must also recognise, for the purposes of cross-border identification, the electronic identification methods (options) established in another Member State (Cirlig 2016). This view is shared by Erdogan and Saran (2021), pointing out that the mutual recognition obligation is limited to those electronic identification means that meet the requirements set out in Article 6 of the eIDAS Regulation (included in the list published by the Commission, assurance level equal to or higher). According to Berbecaru et al (2019), the first precondition that an electronic identification means must fulfil in order to be recognised on the territory of another Member State is a sufficient level of guarantee for that means, which must be at least significant or high.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2002, Estonia used the first national eID with digital signatures [35]. • Solutions implemented by Austria and Estonia are appreciated for their ability to handle user mobility [39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%