2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-27815-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on the Application of Process Mining to Smart Spaces Data

Abstract: During the last years, a number of studies have experimented with applying process mining (PM) techniques to smart spaces data. The general goal has been to automatically model human routines as if they were business processes. However, applying process-oriented techniques to smart spaces data comes with its own set of challenges. This paper surveys existing approaches that apply PM to smart spaces and analyses how they deal with the following challenges identified in the literature: choosing a modelling forma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several techniques can be used to collect personal information such as non-participant observations, screen recordings, and timesheet techniques, each with their own advantages and disadvantages [40]. Regardless of the technique used, collected personal information can be seen as an event log, which can be analyzed using process mining techniques to discover personal work processes [41].…”
Section: Personal Productivity Analysis In Work Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques can be used to collect personal information such as non-participant observations, screen recordings, and timesheet techniques, each with their own advantages and disadvantages [40]. Regardless of the technique used, collected personal information can be seen as an event log, which can be analyzed using process mining techniques to discover personal work processes [41].…”
Section: Personal Productivity Analysis In Work Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research articles [1] often start with an obvious statement or a with an unsupported, maybe even questionable claim, like [2][3][4][5][6]. Sometimes, reviewers are not rigor and wave that through.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%