2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey on time and frequency characteristics of induction motors with broken rotor bars in line-start and inverter-fed modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as the validity of the method at rated frequency has been demonstrated in the theoretical explanation and in the case of study, in the following tests (inverter-fed tests), the IM has been tested at lower frequencies to prove also its validity under these conditions, usual in the case of inverted-fed induction motors. The use of both control methods CV/F (open loop) and DTC (close loop) has been considered of interest due to the fact that, as [34] points out, close-loop controls damps the speed variations due to the fault (2sf ), unlike open-loop controls. Anyway, regardless of the control method, the electromagnetic fault component always appears in the spectrum of the current and in the spectrum of the current envelope.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as the validity of the method at rated frequency has been demonstrated in the theoretical explanation and in the case of study, in the following tests (inverter-fed tests), the IM has been tested at lower frequencies to prove also its validity under these conditions, usual in the case of inverted-fed induction motors. The use of both control methods CV/F (open loop) and DTC (close loop) has been considered of interest due to the fact that, as [34] points out, close-loop controls damps the speed variations due to the fault (2sf ), unlike open-loop controls. Anyway, regardless of the control method, the electromagnetic fault component always appears in the spectrum of the current and in the spectrum of the current envelope.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used random forests for the detection of rotor faults, and assessed the effectiveness of random forests by comparing with a decision tree, a Naïve Bayes classifier, logistic regression, linear ridge, and a support vector machine. To train these machine learning algorithms, we extracted thirteen time domain features from the transient current signal of the LS-PMSM, with the selection of the features based on prior work [22,23]. While machine learning methods have been used for fault detection in induction motors [7][8][9][10][11], to the best of our knowledge this is the first work to present fault analysis in LS-PMSMs by comparing various machine learning algorithms and using features extracted from the transient current signal to train and test these algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCSA allows noninvasive fault 2 Shock and Vibration diagnosis online [4]. This technique uses a Hall-effect sensor to measure signals of stator current and a data acquisition system to acquire the signal [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%