2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Training Issues in Chili Leaf Diseases Identification Using Deep Learning Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the DenseNet201 model achieved 92% accuracy with a success rate of 87%, accurately predicting 13 out of 15 images. Drawing from the previous research [18]- [20], this study shares similarities in terms of using relatively small datasets. However, the CNN model proposed in this study differs from the CNN models used in the mentioned studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the DenseNet201 model achieved 92% accuracy with a success rate of 87%, accurately predicting 13 out of 15 images. Drawing from the previous research [18]- [20], this study shares similarities in terms of using relatively small datasets. However, the CNN model proposed in this study differs from the CNN models used in the mentioned studies.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper ( Kanaparthi and Ilango, 2023 ), DL methods investigated the training issues on the Chilli leaf diseases dataset. This research uses 160 images from the public domain repository on Kaggle to assess the efficacy of the Squeeze-Net training architecture in identifying Geminivirus and Mosaic-infected Chilli leaves.…”
Section: Ai-based Automated Vegetables Disease Detection Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squeeze-Net training architecture is proposed by Kantha Raju Kanaparthi et al [ 30 ] to train chilli leaves for identifying Gemini and Mosaic viruses. Considering several training features like CNN optimizers stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGDM), Adaptive Moment (ADAM), and Root Mean Squared Propagation (RMSPROP), the resulting training accuracy can range from 50 % to 100 %.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%