2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Control Science and Systems Engineering (ICCSSE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ccsse.2018.8724809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Wireless Power Transfer based Charging Scheduling Schemes in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, complicated charging route planning and little scalability reduced the excellent feasibility and increased charging efficiency in low-density WRSNs. The Advantages of PTP charging schemes can be summarized as: (1) Suitable for sparse networks, (2) Reduce the charging frequency and enhance its efficiency, (3) Minimize the total power consumption of the sensor network, and the charging method, (4) Maximize the vacation time ratio of the WCVs in each cycle time, and (5) Maximize the travel route, the charging period in each node and discharge guidance techniques, and the optimal travel path of WCVs rotated out to be the quickest Hamiltonian cycle passing via all sensor nodes [21]. On the other hand, the main disadvantage of such schemes is lowering the charging scalability and inefficiency, especially in dense networks.…”
Section: B the Charging Model Of Wcvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, complicated charging route planning and little scalability reduced the excellent feasibility and increased charging efficiency in low-density WRSNs. The Advantages of PTP charging schemes can be summarized as: (1) Suitable for sparse networks, (2) Reduce the charging frequency and enhance its efficiency, (3) Minimize the total power consumption of the sensor network, and the charging method, (4) Maximize the vacation time ratio of the WCVs in each cycle time, and (5) Maximize the travel route, the charging period in each node and discharge guidance techniques, and the optimal travel path of WCVs rotated out to be the quickest Hamiltonian cycle passing via all sensor nodes [21]. On the other hand, the main disadvantage of such schemes is lowering the charging scalability and inefficiency, especially in dense networks.…”
Section: B the Charging Model Of Wcvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key study proposes a methodology of distributing many MCs to sustain performance levels of R-WSN of life-critical sensor nodes [16]. It is also proposed a novel idea called "shuttling," as well as an optimal charging mechanism that used charger collaboration to reduce the number of chargers and increase the sensing range [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-hop communication from each sensor to MR can be useful to extend their lifetime. On the other hand, both energy recharging and sensory data transmitting can be done by means of MR visiting [ 10 , 11 ]. Each sensor can obtain energy from MR and transfer sensory data to MR for storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%