2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/2569645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Wireless Transmitter Localization Using Signal Strength Measurements

Abstract: Knowledge of deployed transmitters’ (Tx) locations in a wireless network improves many aspects of network management. Operators and building administrators are interested in locating unknown Txs for optimizing new Tx placement, detecting and removing unauthorized Txs, selecting the nearest Tx to offload traffic onto it, and constructing radio maps for indoor and outdoor navigation. This survey provides a comprehensive review of existing algorithms that estimate the location of a wireless Tx given a set of obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of the study proved that discarding these erroneous UE measurements increased the effectiveness of the small cell localization algorithm where large location errors (larger than 100 meters) can be eliminated compared to non RF fingerprint methods [32].The study claims to provide an accuracy of 20-50% improvement of the serving cell size where a typical cell radius of 250m yields location accuracy of approximately 50m to 125m. The result is consistent with other studies where outliers proved to be the concentration of other studies regardless of the algorithm used [2,10,14,18,24,32,33]. Li [14] approach of handling outliers was to characterize the crowdsourced datasets into spatial, localization algorithm and combined RSS with spatial.…”
Section: Outlierssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding of the study proved that discarding these erroneous UE measurements increased the effectiveness of the small cell localization algorithm where large location errors (larger than 100 meters) can be eliminated compared to non RF fingerprint methods [32].The study claims to provide an accuracy of 20-50% improvement of the serving cell size where a typical cell radius of 250m yields location accuracy of approximately 50m to 125m. The result is consistent with other studies where outliers proved to be the concentration of other studies regardless of the algorithm used [2,10,14,18,24,32,33]. Li [14] approach of handling outliers was to characterize the crowdsourced datasets into spatial, localization algorithm and combined RSS with spatial.…”
Section: Outlierssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Estimated Basestation Position 1 Centroid [15] Middle of geometric measurement 2 Minimum Enclosing Circle [16] Middle of minimum enclosing circle of total samples 3 Weighted Centroid [17] Middle of RSS-weighted geometric samples 4 Grid based [18] Middle of grid within likelihood of strongest RSS 5 Ecolocation [19] Position with the highest statistical value for RSS-distance relationship heatmap 6 Highest RSS [20] Position of sample with the highest RSS value 7 Model based [21][22][23] Position of the strongest predicted RSS using a model tuned propagation model both XML and CDR methods require permission from the MNO and adherence to privacy laws. In summary, public databases are a good source of data as it contains a large set of data from crowdsourcing which offer researchers volume across different terrain, countries, and technology.…”
Section: # Localization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimate the location of the transmitter from the measurements of RSS at the reporting sensors by the weighted centroid approach [31]. Rather than using just the current RSS measurements, z rts , we propose to include all the past information about the transmitter location as…”
Section: A Estimation Of the Transmitter Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also allows the GP to learn more quickly and to correct for the modeling errors. In other words, GPs, being quite robust, will compensate for errors in the estimation of the mean term, i.e., in the exponent loss and transmitted power in (31) and (34).…”
Section: A the Kernel And Its Hyper-parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In range-based techniques, time difference of arrival (TDoA), time of arrival (ToA), angle of arrival (AoA), and received signal strength indicator (RSSI) are dominant [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. TDoA and ToA are sensitive to timing errors; thus, accurate time synchronization between the readers (receivers) of these IoT devices (senders) is crucial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%