2021
DOI: 10.1038/s43588-021-00083-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survival model generalized to regression learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We simulated drug termination data of a population following a survival study [ 13 ] (Figure 1b). We generated a population of total n individuals, where the termination rate for each individual is drawn from a population of p = N(p mean , σ ), and we force the minimal termination rate to be zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We simulated drug termination data of a population following a survival study [ 13 ] (Figure 1b). We generated a population of total n individuals, where the termination rate for each individual is drawn from a population of p = N(p mean , σ ), and we force the minimal termination rate to be zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, scAB adopts the penalty term of phenotype scores, that is the relative survival score in survival analysis. Instead of directly using the survival data of patients like in Scissor, we transformed the survival data to relative survival score of patients, which showed better performance than the Cox model in a previous study ( 12 ). Compared with the loss function of the Cox model, the relative survival score does not require the proportional hazard assumption and importantly includes two additional survival cases (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scenario where the phenotype is survival information, we require the user to input a two-column table including the survival time and survival state of each bulk sample. To develop a unified computational framework, we transform the survival information to a single phenotype score of each patient, which is defined as follow, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$$\begin{equation*}{s_{ij}} = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1 - \displaystyle\frac{{score(sampl{e_i})}}{{\max (score(sampl{e_i}))}}, & \quad i = j \\ 0 , & \quad {\rm{otherwise}} \end{array} \right.. \end{equation*}$$\end{document} where score(sample i ) is the relative survival score of sample i that is computed using a generalized survival model ( 12 ). Compared to the Cox model, the relative survival score includes two additional survival cases, including early-censored–late-uncensored pairs and early-censored–late-censored pairs ( Supplementary Table S1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning algorithms have been widely used to address biological and biomedical imaging problems in recent years [1][2][3][4]. Common image-related tasks include detection of cell nuclei [5][6][7], semantic segmentation of tumors [8][9][10][11], and diagnosis of diseases [12][13][14][15][16][17]. In general, standard computer vision tasks are straightforward, such as object detection, segmentation, or classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%