2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sustainability comparison between conventional and high-speed machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the average power required to drive the employed MQL system at the air pressure, oil mixing rate, and air flow rate of 0.6 MPa, 30 mL/h, and 0.4 L/s, respectively, is 418 Watts. The details regarding the calculations can be seen in Reference [35]. By adding the above calculated values of power requirements, the SCE values ranged from 57.6 to 82 J/mm 3 , 74.5 to 131 J/mm 3 , and 5.2 to 8.3 J/mm 3 , respectively, for CO 2 snow, LN 2 , and micro-lubrication.…”
Section: Specific Cutting Energy and Machining Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, the average power required to drive the employed MQL system at the air pressure, oil mixing rate, and air flow rate of 0.6 MPa, 30 mL/h, and 0.4 L/s, respectively, is 418 Watts. The details regarding the calculations can be seen in Reference [35]. By adding the above calculated values of power requirements, the SCE values ranged from 57.6 to 82 J/mm 3 , 74.5 to 131 J/mm 3 , and 5.2 to 8.3 J/mm 3 , respectively, for CO 2 snow, LN 2 , and micro-lubrication.…”
Section: Specific Cutting Energy and Machining Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the effect of cutting speed on process cost was not very clear, as this predictor asserted its effects on all five constituents of PC in different ways. With regard to a continuous cutting process, it was reported that high-speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V yielded better surface finish and caused lower consumption of specific energy than conventional machining, but fared poorly with respect to the sustainability measures of tool life and process cost [35]. The graphs highlight a phenomenon that sets apart the cryogenic fluids from micro-lubrication.…”
Section: Process Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have described that texture features of the graylevel co-occurrence matrix appearing on machined part are strongly related to the machining time of the cutting tool. AlGhamdi and Iqbal (2015) have put forward a comparison between the phenomena of conventional machining and high-speed machining in the perspective of sustainability metrics such as tool life, specific energy consumption, productivity, process cost, and machining forces. It was reported that high-speed machining outperformed conventional machining in respect of productivity and energy consumption but could not perform better with respect to the other metrics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the current work aims to study the effects of using three levels of flank wear as tool life criterion in conjunction with those of cutting speed, feed rate, work material temper state, and MQL on the sustainability metrics, namely energy consumption, productivity, work surface finish, and process cost in milling of a cold work tool steel. The current work uses the same metrics, except machining forces, for evaluation of the process's sustainability as were used in the previous work (Al-Ghamdi and Iqbal, 2015). However, as the process investigated in this work is an intermittent cutting process, as compared to the continuous cutting process used in the previous work, the evaluation of the metrics is altogether different.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in another work have presented a multi-objective analysis of energy consumption, process cost, and work surface roughness of a machining process based on optimization of cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut [3]. In a recent work, a comparison between tool life, process cost, productivity, and specific energy consumption has been provided [4]. Another work presents a model that optimizes cutting parameters for maximization of profit per unit energy consumption in a single pass turning process [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%