2018 International Workshop on Advanced Image Technology (IWAIT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iwait.2018.8369646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SVM-based diagnosis of melanoma using only useful image features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the images of the database were selected on the basis of their quality, resolution and dermoscopic features. Good results were obtained also in [7] on the same data set Ph 2 , On the other hand, the objective in [34] was to select the most important image features usable in melanoma detection. In this case, differently from [33] where a high quality data set was adopted, the authors performed their experimentations on a data set constituted by plain photographs publicly available from two online databases https://www.dermquest.coml and http://www.dermins.netl, obtaining very good results in terms of sensitivity (96.77%) and, consequently, in terms of F-score (90.91%).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the images of the database were selected on the basis of their quality, resolution and dermoscopic features. Good results were obtained also in [7] on the same data set Ph 2 , On the other hand, the objective in [34] was to select the most important image features usable in melanoma detection. In this case, differently from [33] where a high quality data set was adopted, the authors performed their experimentations on a data set constituted by plain photographs publicly available from two online databases https://www.dermquest.coml and http://www.dermins.netl, obtaining very good results in terms of sensitivity (96.77%) and, consequently, in terms of F-score (90.91%).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In this section a preliminary numerical comparison between two different approaches (Support Vector Machine and Multiple Instance Learning) is reported, using color and color/texture features. This study starts from some considerations related to the works [7,33,34]. In [33] the authors analyzed the role played by the color and the texture features, showing empirically that using only the color features outperforms the use of the texture features: very good results were obtained by means of different type of classifiers on a image data set drawn from the Ph 2 database [8], containing 200 melanocytic lesions images (80 common nevi, 80 atypical nevi and 40 melanomas).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosing melanoma using SVM having only useful image features was the work of Mustafa, S (2018). RBF kernel is the first hyper parameters having C for cost parameter and Y for kernel parameter.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S(i,j) calculation was done with 15 features extraction. This being the condition, exhaustive grid search was done to determine the optimum turning parameters C and Y that would be required for improving SVM-RBF performance [38].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides most groups trust in CNNs in recent researches, some are still using other methods. Mustafa and Kimura followed an approach for melanoma classification based on manually developing and selecting features [6]. Lesions of interest are segmented using the GrabCut algorithm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%