Fifth IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (Wmute 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/wmute.2008.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SWOT Analysis of m-Learning Diffusion in China and Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dyson (1990) listed out a number of analytical techniques, such as the experience curve, the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threat) analysis, the PIMS (Profitability Impact of Marketing Strategies) model and the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix, each with specific advantages and disadvantages that allow a comparative or competitive positioning of businesses or business units. Thus far, efforts have been made to solve the strategic tool problems and some alternative methods have been put forward: (i) the concept of grand strategy matrix-where companies are placed in the four quadrants of the coordinates according to their respective categories (Christensen, Berg, & Salter, 1976), (ii) A'WOT (Analytic, Weakness, Opportunities, Threat) method-a hybrid method to eliminate the weaknesses in the measurement and evaluation steps of the SWOTanalysis (Kajanus, Kangas, & Kurttila, 2004;Kurttila, Pesonen, Kangas, & Kajanus, 2000), (iii) analytic network process-a multi-criteria decision-making technique for solving complicated problems (Yü ksel & Dagdeviren, 2007) and (iv) a fuzzy SWOT matrix-an algorithm for rectifying the shortcomings and problems of the SWOT matrix through the use of fuzzy sets (Ghazinoory, Zadeh, & Memariani, 2007;Lee & Chang, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyson (1990) listed out a number of analytical techniques, such as the experience curve, the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threat) analysis, the PIMS (Profitability Impact of Marketing Strategies) model and the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix, each with specific advantages and disadvantages that allow a comparative or competitive positioning of businesses or business units. Thus far, efforts have been made to solve the strategic tool problems and some alternative methods have been put forward: (i) the concept of grand strategy matrix-where companies are placed in the four quadrants of the coordinates according to their respective categories (Christensen, Berg, & Salter, 1976), (ii) A'WOT (Analytic, Weakness, Opportunities, Threat) method-a hybrid method to eliminate the weaknesses in the measurement and evaluation steps of the SWOTanalysis (Kajanus, Kangas, & Kurttila, 2004;Kurttila, Pesonen, Kangas, & Kajanus, 2000), (iii) analytic network process-a multi-criteria decision-making technique for solving complicated problems (Yü ksel & Dagdeviren, 2007) and (iv) a fuzzy SWOT matrix-an algorithm for rectifying the shortcomings and problems of the SWOT matrix through the use of fuzzy sets (Ghazinoory, Zadeh, & Memariani, 2007;Lee & Chang, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyson (1990) lists a number of analytical techniques, such as: the experience curve, SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threat) analysis, the PIMS (Profitability Impact of Marketing Strategies) model, and the BCG (Boston Consulting Group) matrix, each with specific advantages and disadvantages that allow a comparative or competitive positioning of businesses or business units. Thus far, efforts have been made to solve the strategic tools problems and some alternative methods have been put forward: (i) the concept of GSM (Grand Strategy Matrix)where companies are parked in the four quadrants of the coordinates according to their respective categories (Christensen, Berg & Salter,1976), (ii) A'WOT (Analytic, Weakness, Opportunities, Threat)a hybrid method to eliminate the weaknesses in the measurement and evaluation steps of the SWOT analysis (Kurttila, Pesonen, Kangas & Kajanus, 2000;Kajanus, Kangas & Kurttila, 2004), (iii) ANP (Analytic Network Process)a multi-criteria decision making technique for solving complicated problems (Yüksel & Dagdeviren, 2007), (iv) a fuzzy SWOT matrixan algorithm for rectifying the shortcomings and problems of the SWOT matrix through the use of fuzzy sets (Ghazinoory, Zadeh & Memariani, 2007;Lee & Chang, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%