Urban and Regional Data Management 2009
DOI: 10.1201/9780203869352.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SWOT analysis on the implementation of Building Information Models within the geospatial environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several standards also share many concepts, but these concepts are defined in similar, but not identical ways. One example of this is the geometry representation, IFC uses many different types of geometries e.g., Swept Solid, Constructive Solid Geometry, and BRep, while CityGML only uses BRep, which can result in complex geometric transformations [6,7]. Another example is the LOD concept, in IFC LOD stands for Level of Development and in CityGML for Level of Detail, and the two LODs do not match.…”
Section: Integration Of 3d City Models and Bimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several standards also share many concepts, but these concepts are defined in similar, but not identical ways. One example of this is the geometry representation, IFC uses many different types of geometries e.g., Swept Solid, Constructive Solid Geometry, and BRep, while CityGML only uses BRep, which can result in complex geometric transformations [6,7]. Another example is the LOD concept, in IFC LOD stands for Level of Development and in CityGML for Level of Detail, and the two LODs do not match.…”
Section: Integration Of 3d City Models and Bimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the purpose of a 3D city model and expertise, the models are developed on different platforms using different techniques, e.g. using 3D GIS, BIM, or computer graphics [2,3,6].One obstacle with linking building information between BIM and 3D city models is that 3D city models generally have a hierarchically strict structure as opposed to BIM where the same information can be described and associated in many ways [7][8][9]. One possible way to overcome such interoperable issues is to use a classification system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, this makes BIM more suitable for GIS-integration. On the other hand, it makes BIM more complex and complicated for integration and harmonization tasks (Zlatanova and Isikdag, 2009). While BIM is not a model itself, but rather a paradigm, using the ISO standard "Industry Foundation Classes" (IFC) has proven to be the preferred method of implementing BIMs (Zlatanova and Isikdag, 2009).…”
Section: Data Acquisition (R2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BIM/GIS integration is a very important topic: Zlatanova and Isikdag (2009) performed a SWOT analysis regarding this topic. While they recognized some challenges on the technical (e.g.…”
Section: Data Acquisition (R2)mentioning
confidence: 99%