2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10472-017-9553-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A symbolic algebra for the computation of expected utilities in multiplicative influence diagrams

Abstract: Influence diagrams provide a compact graphical representation of decision problems. Several algorithms for the quick computation of their associated expected utilities are available in the literature. However, often they rely on a full quantification of both probabilistic uncertainties and utility values. For problems where all random variables and decision spaces are finite and discrete, here we develop a symbolic way to calculate the expected utilities of influence diagrams that does not require a full numer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the above-mentioned results, although specifically derived for BNs, hold for a variety of models whose atomic probabilities can be written as a multilinear polynomial (Leonelli et al, 2017a). The multilinear structure of atomic probabilities in BNs has been known for quite some time (Castillo et al, 1995;Darwiche, 2003), but other models entertain the same property under specific parametrisations, for instance stratified staged trees (Görgen et al, 2015), context-specific BNs (Boutilier et al, 1996) and influence diagrams (Leonelli et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the above-mentioned results, although specifically derived for BNs, hold for a variety of models whose atomic probabilities can be written as a multilinear polynomial (Leonelli et al, 2017a). The multilinear structure of atomic probabilities in BNs has been known for quite some time (Castillo et al, 1995;Darwiche, 2003), but other models entertain the same property under specific parametrisations, for instance stratified staged trees (Görgen et al, 2015), context-specific BNs (Boutilier et al, 1996) and influence diagrams (Leonelli et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%