2007
DOI: 10.1002/mana.200410495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A symmetrization result for Monge–Ampère type equations

Abstract: Key words Monge-Ampère equations, eigenvalue problems MSC (2000) 35J25, 35J65In this paper we prove some comparison results for Monge-Ampère type equations in dimension two. We also consider the case of eigenfunctions and we derive a kind of "reverse" inequalities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chiti's results have been generalized to nonlinear equations (see, for instance, [1] and [8]) and to the eigenvalue problem for the Hermite equation via the Gaussian symmetrization (see [7]). We finally recall that Chiti's type estimates were also used by Ashbaugh and Benguria in order to solve the well-known Payne-Pólya-Weinberger conjecture (see [3]) and its generalization on the n-dimensional sphere S n (see [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiti's results have been generalized to nonlinear equations (see, for instance, [1] and [8]) and to the eigenvalue problem for the Hermite equation via the Gaussian symmetrization (see [7]). We finally recall that Chiti's type estimates were also used by Ashbaugh and Benguria in order to solve the well-known Payne-Pólya-Weinberger conjecture (see [3]) and its generalization on the n-dimensional sphere S n (see [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2 Inequality (4.1) for k = 1 and k = n becomes respectively the results of Talenti [25] and of Brandolini and Trombetti [7].…”
Section: The Payne-rayner Type Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…the Monge-Ampère operator, in dimension n = 2, in [7] it has been proven a similar inequality, where in the right-hand side of (1.8) does not appear u q , but u q , where u is the rearrangement of u with respect to the perimeter of its level lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations