2006
DOI: 10.5858/2006-130-1825-asrsfb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Synoptic Reporting System for Bone Marrow Aspiration and Core Biopsy Specimens

Abstract: Context.—Advances in information technology have made electronic systems productive tools for pathology report generation. Structured data formats are recommended for better understanding of pathology reports by clinicians and for retrieval of pathology reports. Suitable formats need to be developed to include structured data elements for report generation in electronic systems. Objective.—To conform to the requirement of protocol-based reporting and to provide uniform and standardized data entr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey results indicate that synoptic reporting improved data quality in terms of completeness, clarity, and consistency compared to narrative reporting. This is in line with previous studies and widely acknowledged in the diagnostic disciplines [10,16,32,33,35,36]. Several studies demonstrated increased completeness in synoptical reports across various cancer reports including the breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate [35,[37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The survey results indicate that synoptic reporting improved data quality in terms of completeness, clarity, and consistency compared to narrative reporting. This is in line with previous studies and widely acknowledged in the diagnostic disciplines [10,16,32,33,35,36]. Several studies demonstrated increased completeness in synoptical reports across various cancer reports including the breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate [35,[37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The usage of synoptic reporting reduced time for documentation of examination results compared to traditional narrative reporting, which is in line with previous studies [32]. Potential reasons include the reduced effort for text formatting [32, 33], correction of dictation errors (casus, numerus, and genus of word endings) [33], use of defaults (normal finding), automated calculations (prostate volume and tumor volumes in biopsies), proofreading for completeness, and consistency of the report [11, 13, 14]. The comparison of time savings between diagnostic departments showed greater time savings for radiology compared to pathology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…[ 12 13 ] Based on the CAP checklist, Murari and Pandey proposed synoptic reporting system for bone marrow specimens, in 2006, and a similar synoptic system for hematological and lymphoid neoplasms was devised by Mohanty et al . [ 14 15 ] Detailed guidelines for the application of the checklist in synoptic bone marrow reporting were subsequently published by the CAP Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. [ 4 ] However, these guidelines do not specifically address the reporting of bone marrow quality parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a system based on background information found in the standard protocol for marrow reports generates diagnostic and prognostic bone marrow aspiration and biopsy synoptic reports in macro text or template formats [43]. Yet, the abovementioned research is limited in transforming biomedical information in free-text format to a structurized, relational format.…”
Section: Review Of Current Research On Structurizing Biomedical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the bulk of biomedically significant information is stored in free-text format without any predefined structure. This makes the computational analysis of data and their relationships across pathology reports a daunting task [43]. In addition to that, [38], [39], [42], [48], [60]- [66].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%