1984
DOI: 10.1127/phyto/12/1984/563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A syntaxonomic study of steppe vegetation in Central Anatolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples The name ‘ Ranunculo repentis‐Rumicenion crispi Hejný & Kopecký 1979’ in Hejný et al (1979, p. 74) is not validly published as the original diagnosis of the suballiance contains several validly published associations and no nomenclatural type is indicated. The new name ‘ Rumici crispi‐Agropyretum repentis Hejný’ in Hejný et al (1979, p. 77) is validly published as the original diagnosis contains only one relevé which is the holotype of the name. The name ‘Teucrietum scorodoniae’ in Pott (1992, p. 297) has not been validly published as three elements (relevés 1 to 3 in table 8) have been indicated as the nomenclatural type instead of one. In an attempt to validate the name ‘Salvio cryptanthae‐Stipetum lessingianae’ that was invalidly published in Akman et al (1984, p. 570) due to a missing type relevé, Quézel et al (1993, p. 86) indicated the relevé 1 in table 2 (“T. 2, r. 1”) of the work published in 1984 as the type.…”
Section: International Code Of Phytosociological Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples The name ‘ Ranunculo repentis‐Rumicenion crispi Hejný & Kopecký 1979’ in Hejný et al (1979, p. 74) is not validly published as the original diagnosis of the suballiance contains several validly published associations and no nomenclatural type is indicated. The new name ‘ Rumici crispi‐Agropyretum repentis Hejný’ in Hejný et al (1979, p. 77) is validly published as the original diagnosis contains only one relevé which is the holotype of the name. The name ‘Teucrietum scorodoniae’ in Pott (1992, p. 297) has not been validly published as three elements (relevés 1 to 3 in table 8) have been indicated as the nomenclatural type instead of one. In an attempt to validate the name ‘Salvio cryptanthae‐Stipetum lessingianae’ that was invalidly published in Akman et al (1984, p. 570) due to a missing type relevé, Quézel et al (1993, p. 86) indicated the relevé 1 in table 2 (“T. 2, r. 1”) of the work published in 1984 as the type.…”
Section: International Code Of Phytosociological Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steppes are grouped in three, according to their soil type. Calcereous steppes are the widest and best (Akman, 1974;Akman and Ketenoglu, 1976;Çetik, 1981;Akman et al, 1984Akman et al, , 1985Akman et al, , 1991Akman et al, , 1996Ocakverdi and Ünal, 1991;Ketenoglu et al, 1996;Aydogdu et al, 1999;Hamzaoglu, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the calcereous brown soils of Central Anatolia on which Artemisia santonicum communities were defined, salinity is very low or absent. Halophytic species are absent in the floristic composition of these communities (Akman and Ketenoglu, 1976;Akman et al, 1984;Ocakverdi and Çetik, 1987;Ocakverdi and Ünal, 1991;Tatlı et al, 1994;Akman et al, 1996;Aydogdu et al, 1999Aydogdu et al, , 2001Hamzaglu, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Generally, this region has been included in the Irano-Turanian phytogeographical region by Zohary and is commonly referred to as the ''Central Anatolian'' province (Zohary, 1973). As in most of the world, steppe vegetation in Central Analolia has been exploited for grazing and intensive agriculture activities (Akman et al, 1984). In the region, many grazing areas have been converted to croplands, especially from the early 1950s to the late 1970s (Bakır, 1987;Bü yü kburç, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%