2003
DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v55i2.16722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synthesis of the impact of Russian forests on the global carbon budget for 1961–1998

Abstract: An attempt is made to synthesize the current understanding of the impact of Russian forests on the global carbon (C) budget for the period 1961-1998 (37 years), based on a detailed inventory of pools and fluxes in 1988-1992, and a historical reconstruction of a full forest carbon budget for 1961-1998. All major intermediate indicators of the budget (phytomass, net primary production, impact of disturbances, soil respiration, etc.) were independently estimated and compared with earlier reported results. During … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potter et al (2003a) noted exceptions during relatively cool temperature periods such as 1991-1992 and 1995-1996 when the Eurasian continental carbon sink was predicted to vary between 0.1 and 0.25 Pg C per year. These results are consistent with those reported from satellite observations and forest inventory data by Myneni et al (2001), who estimated a biomass sink for Eurasian forests of 0.48 Pg C per year over the period 1981-1999, and by Shvidenko and Nilsson (2003), who estimated a carbon sink for Russian forests of 0.27 Pg C per year over the period 1961-1998. In order to add detail to continental-scale estimates, ecosystem modeling approaches represent the terrestrial biosphere as thousands of geo-referenced pixel elements, with detailed physiological processes simulated for each pixel to transport CO 2 between the simulated land surface and the atmosphere, and to store carbon at the pixel location (Potter, 1999;Potter et al, 2003a,b). This type of spatial modeling approach cannot only identify sub-continental carbon sink locations (Dargaville et al, 2002), but also characterize the historical changes in land cover properties and actual vegetation type at each pixel location using satellite remote sensing.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Potter et al (2003a) noted exceptions during relatively cool temperature periods such as 1991-1992 and 1995-1996 when the Eurasian continental carbon sink was predicted to vary between 0.1 and 0.25 Pg C per year. These results are consistent with those reported from satellite observations and forest inventory data by Myneni et al (2001), who estimated a biomass sink for Eurasian forests of 0.48 Pg C per year over the period 1981-1999, and by Shvidenko and Nilsson (2003), who estimated a carbon sink for Russian forests of 0.27 Pg C per year over the period 1961-1998. In order to add detail to continental-scale estimates, ecosystem modeling approaches represent the terrestrial biosphere as thousands of geo-referenced pixel elements, with detailed physiological processes simulated for each pixel to transport CO 2 between the simulated land surface and the atmosphere, and to store carbon at the pixel location (Potter, 1999;Potter et al, 2003a,b). This type of spatial modeling approach cannot only identify sub-continental carbon sink locations (Dargaville et al, 2002), but also characterize the historical changes in land cover properties and actual vegetation type at each pixel location using satellite remote sensing.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Estimates based on national forest inventory data indicate a significant net sink between 1961 and 1998 (433 Tg C yr −1 total, 155 Tg C yr −1 in live forest biomass) (Shvidenko and Nilsson, 2003) and an increase in productivity of forests of 20-25%, primarily in the Western part of Russia (Alexeyev et al, 2004). To improve understanding of human interactions with terrestrial ecosystems and C fluxes and make realistic predictions, a more narrow regional focus is necessary.…”
Section: Past Studies Of Regional Forest Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fires and insect pests impose the major disturbances in northern forests (Kurz and Apps, 1999;Shvidenko and Nilsson, 2003). However, the land area affected by pollution in the boreal forest zone of Fennoscandia, due to nearly 80 years of industrial activity in the Kola Peninsula (107,200 km 2 , as estimated from Cu concentrations in forest litter: Reimann et al, 1998), exceeded by a factor of 500 the total area of extensive forest fires in the north-western Russia in a normal year in early 2000s (which averaged ca.…”
Section: Carbon Losses From Forests Due To Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%