2001
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synthetic validity approach to testing differential prediction hypotheses.

Abstract: A new method is presented for conducting differential prediction analyses that makes it possible to test differential prediction hypotheses with adequate statistical power even when the sample size within a job or a job family is very small. This method, called synthetic differential prediction analysis, represents an application of the logic of synthetic validation to differential prediction analyses. The authors explain this new method and describe its application in a selection-system validation study condu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned, credibility intervals indicate when synthetic validity is feasible, as they tell us whether the validity coefficients sufficiently generalize (see also Johnson, Carter, Davison, & Oliver, 2001). Validity coefficients can generalize even if none of the variance is accounted for through a moderator search.…”
Section: Previous Jcv Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As mentioned, credibility intervals indicate when synthetic validity is feasible, as they tell us whether the validity coefficients sufficiently generalize (see also Johnson, Carter, Davison, & Oliver, 2001). Validity coefficients can generalize even if none of the variance is accounted for through a moderator search.…”
Section: Previous Jcv Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to estimating synthetic validity coefficients, it is possible to use a similar formula presented by Sackett and Ellingson (1997) to compute standardized mean subgroup differences for the test battery. In addition, Johnson, Carter, Davison, and Oliver (2001) demonstrated how the job requirements matrix approach to synthetic validation can be used to increase the power of differential prediction analyses. Thus, the job requirements matrix approach allows the estimation of validity, potential adverse impact, and differential prediction for a selection procedure.…”
Section: Job Requirements Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related advantage is that much larger sample sizes can be obtained for differential prediction analyses using synthetic validation (Johnson et al, 2001). Power to detect slope or intercept differences for different subgroups is typically very low, requiring sample sizes of 400 or greater (Aguinis & Stone-Romero, 1997).…”
Section: More Stable Validity Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the relationship between competency scoring solutions and aligned performance ratings, we followed the unit-weighting procedure recommended by Johnson, Personnel Assessment And decisions investigating competency solutions Carter, Davison, and Oliver (2001). This procedure is based on an equation provided by Nunnally (1978) that calculates an estimate of the overall relationship from multiple predictors when each is unit weighted:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%