2004
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synthetic view on structure and evolution of the Milky Way

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
139
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first box, which are located around the HB magnitude level (21 < r Sloan [mag] < 22), we found that about 8% of Galactic stars survive our proper motion selection, while 25% are in the second box, located at a fainter magnitude level (22 < r Sloan [mag] < 23). We note that similar fractions are expected from a Galactic simulation taken from the Besançon stellar population synthesis models (Robin et al 2003(Robin et al , 2004 after applying the same PM-selection criteria described above. The same simulation allows us to estimate the residual fraction of Galactic stars expected at the same levels of magnitude as above, but for the Galactic blue plume in the colour range −0.5 < B Bessel − r Sloan [mag] < 1.8.…”
Section: Proper Motion Selectionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In the first box, which are located around the HB magnitude level (21 < r Sloan [mag] < 22), we found that about 8% of Galactic stars survive our proper motion selection, while 25% are in the second box, located at a fainter magnitude level (22 < r Sloan [mag] < 23). We note that similar fractions are expected from a Galactic simulation taken from the Besançon stellar population synthesis models (Robin et al 2003(Robin et al , 2004 after applying the same PM-selection criteria described above. The same simulation allows us to estimate the residual fraction of Galactic stars expected at the same levels of magnitude as above, but for the Galactic blue plume in the colour range −0.5 < B Bessel − r Sloan [mag] < 1.8.…”
Section: Proper Motion Selectionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…A statistical conversion from relative to absolute parallax and proper motions -based on the Besançon Galaxy model (Robin et al 2003(Robin et al , 2004) -is applied to derive final estimates of absolute proper motions and trigonometric parallaxes (see Ducourant et al 2007, for a detailed description).…”
Section: Trigonometric Parallax and Proper Motion Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Besançon Galaxy model (Robin et al 2004) was used to generate a sample of bright giants and supergiants (M V < 0) in the region 0 ≤ l ≤ 180 and −20 ≤ b ≤ 20 of our Galaxy (where l and b are the galactic coordinates). The reddening was added separately using the extinction model from Drimmel et al (2003).…”
Section: Number Of Supergiant Stars With Detectable Photocentric Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%