1995
DOI: 10.1007/s001380050013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A system for form-feature-based interpretation of technical drawings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This proposal analysed the structure of the mechanical drawing according to line thickness degrees and distance proportions provided by the standard in order to regenerate the drawing using a CAD software. Similar proposals for CAD-related data representations in non-diagram EDs are RENDER by Nagasamy et al [90] and TECNOS by Bottoni et al [14].…”
Section: Examples Of Contextualisation In Literaturementioning
confidence: 79%
“…This proposal analysed the structure of the mechanical drawing according to line thickness degrees and distance proportions provided by the standard in order to regenerate the drawing using a CAD software. Similar proposals for CAD-related data representations in non-diagram EDs are RENDER by Nagasamy et al [90] and TECNOS by Bottoni et al [14].…”
Section: Examples Of Contextualisation In Literaturementioning
confidence: 79%
“…It should be noted that this system also includes a higherlevel frame-based knowledge representation. Bottoni et al interpret a drawing in terms of form-features, using a set of rewriting rules to represent the decomposition rules for these form-features [5]. We will come back to our own experiments inw 3.…”
Section: Structural and Syntactic Methods In Document And Graphics Anmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Admittedly, this is a hard problem, especially if we want not only to show the feasibility on a very limited scope of drawings, as we did in the CELESSTIN system [23], but also to design a working system for real-life applications. Despite some scientific successes, such as the TECNOS system [2], which uses conditional attributed rewriting systems to recognize a set of assembly and manufacturing form features, or the recent results published by Langrana et al [13], this must still be considered as a real challenge (cf. 4).…”
Section: Representation Of Engineering Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%