2005
DOI: 10.4038/engineer.v38i4.7225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A System for Land Development Approval Management using Geographic Information Systems - A Case Study of Thimbirigasyaya Ward, Colombo

Abstract: In a developing Country like Sri Lanka, it is very important to plan and manage its land development programmes to attract investments to develop land resources. In this context special emphasis should be given to urban areas.The prevailing systems of issuing preliminary land development clearance by the Urban Development Authority (UDA) which is based on a manual filing system consumes significant time and is unable to provide alternative solutions to prospective developers. Most of the countries use Geograph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy of digital database was checked for errors during photocopying and scanning. The errors were checked in comparison with the present regulations and also comparisons were done with field measurements (Leelananda, Wijesekera and Peiris 2005 attribute table as an example of the format of GIS database. Checking of data accuracy was important because any substantial differences in the stored and actual data would not be acceptable to the authorities and also would not receive public confidence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accuracy of digital database was checked for errors during photocopying and scanning. The errors were checked in comparison with the present regulations and also comparisons were done with field measurements (Leelananda, Wijesekera and Peiris 2005 attribute table as an example of the format of GIS database. Checking of data accuracy was important because any substantial differences in the stored and actual data would not be acceptable to the authorities and also would not receive public confidence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,000,000.00 per perch (25 m2) and indicating an approximately 67% rate of increase during 2005-6 period (Kapruka 2008). Considering the requirements of the UDA (1999) and high value of lands, the errors when preparing the database were assessed and were found very low (Leelananda, Wijesekera and Peiris 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation