1966
DOI: 10.1086/294867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A System for Managing Job-Shop Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Job shop, defined by Reiter (1966) as "a collection of specific skills and equipment which stands ready to sell its services to customers on order", where the volume of production remains low, but the equipment is of far higher cost and quality, and operators are specialists.…”
Section: Manufacturing Operation Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Job shop, defined by Reiter (1966) as "a collection of specific skills and equipment which stands ready to sell its services to customers on order", where the volume of production remains low, but the equipment is of far higher cost and quality, and operators are specialists.…”
Section: Manufacturing Operation Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the path containing (1, k) -(2, k), we have (18), (19), (20), (21) and (22) that x' is still optimal, but the index of the last critical sublot is less than k in N(x'). This yields a contradiction with the definition of x.…”
Section: '�mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term was introduced by Reiter [19], but the idea has been considered many times under different names. The increased interest in its applications over the last few years is probably due to the fact that it is consistent with the Just-In-Time (JIT) philosophy of making small or single unit sublots and it also agrees with the basic idea of the commercially successful OPT scheduling package [8], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus (2, k) and (2, s) are lower and upper critical corners, respectively, unless k = 0 or k = s. If k # 0 and k # s, then from Observations 1 and 2, we get s s -1 PI L Xi < P2 L Xi i=k+I i=k s s -1 and P2 L Xi 2: p3 L Xi . 16 i=k+I i=k…”
Section: Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%