1974
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.131.6.670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A System of Neglect: Indian Boarding Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As of 2006, the AHF indicated that some 86,000 ''survivors'' of the residential school system were then still living, while an additional 287,350 Aboriginal persons were estimated to have experienced the ''intergenerational impacts'' of these institutions. The adverse psychosocial correlates of indigenous matriculation to residential and boarding schools have been documented across several studies in both Canada and the United States (Boyce & Boyce, 1983;Corrado & Cohen, 2003;Dinges & Duong-Tran, 1994;Dlugokinski & Kramer, 1974;Irwin & Roll, 1995;Krush, Bjork, Sindell, & Nelle, 1966;Million, 2000), but it is in Canada where such attention has rendered the residential school experience a principal exemplar of HT for First Nations peoples (Assembly of First Nations, 1994; Bull, 1991;Miller, 1996;Milloy, 1999). In response, the mandate of the AHF was to disburse hundreds of millions of dollars to Aboriginal communities for support of local healing initiatives that would counteract the intergenerational legacy of abuse in the residential schools.…”
Section: Situating the Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of 2006, the AHF indicated that some 86,000 ''survivors'' of the residential school system were then still living, while an additional 287,350 Aboriginal persons were estimated to have experienced the ''intergenerational impacts'' of these institutions. The adverse psychosocial correlates of indigenous matriculation to residential and boarding schools have been documented across several studies in both Canada and the United States (Boyce & Boyce, 1983;Corrado & Cohen, 2003;Dinges & Duong-Tran, 1994;Dlugokinski & Kramer, 1974;Irwin & Roll, 1995;Krush, Bjork, Sindell, & Nelle, 1966;Million, 2000), but it is in Canada where such attention has rendered the residential school experience a principal exemplar of HT for First Nations peoples (Assembly of First Nations, 1994; Bull, 1991;Miller, 1996;Milloy, 1999). In response, the mandate of the AHF was to disburse hundreds of millions of dollars to Aboriginal communities for support of local healing initiatives that would counteract the intergenerational legacy of abuse in the residential schools.…”
Section: Situating the Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has two main streams of focus. One looks at the formation of an educational policy intended to wipe out indigenous cultures through the use of federally funded, off-reservation boarding schools during the era of forced assimilation (e.g., Adams, 1995; Chalcraft, 2004; Dlugokinski & Kramer, 1974; Goodburn, 1994; Hamley, 1994; McBeth, 1983; Rubenstein, 1976; Szasz, 1999; Trennert, 1988). The second stream explores how Indian students and their parents experienced, negotiated, and, at times, resisted acculturation in the boarding schools during the Progressive Era (1930-1950; e.g., Bloom, 2000; Child, 1999; Collins, 2000; Davis, 2001; Ellis, 1996; Haig-Brown, 1988; Katanski, 2005; Lomawaima, 1994; Riney, 1999; Trafzer & Keller, 2006).…”
Section: The American Indian Boarding School Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kleinfeld and Bloom (1977) reported that as many as 75 percent of the Native children in an Alaskan boarding school experienced school-related social or emotional problems. The indictment of boarding schools was summarized in articles by Dlugokinski and Kramer (1974) and Beiser (197.4a) who consider such settings to promote a system of neglect and to be a hazard to mental health. Both articles describe the inadequate staf~ng ratio of a typical boarding school and emphasize once more the high dropout rates, which in some cases included 60 percent of the student body as compared to 23 percent in the majority population.…”
Section: Indian Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%