A System-Wide Population Health Value Approach to Reduce Hospitalization Among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: an Observational Study

Abstract

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a leading cause of healthcare morbidity, utilization, and expenditures nationally, and caring for late-stage CKD populations is complex. Improving health system efficiency could mitigate these outcomes and, in the COVID-19 era, reduce risks of viral exposure. Objective As part of a system-wide transformation to improve healthcare value among populations with high healthcare utilization and morbidity, UCLA Health evaluated a new patient-centered approach that we hypothesized would reduce inpatient utilization for CKD patients. Design For 18 months in 2015–2016 and 12 months in 2017, we conducted an interrupted time series regression analysis to evaluate the intervention’s impact on inpatient utilization. We used internal electronic health records and claims data across six payers. Participants A total of 1442 stage 4–5 CKD patients at a large academic medical center. Intervention Between October and December 2016, the organization implemented a Population Health Value CKD intervention for the CKD stages 4–5 population. A multispecialty leadership team risk stratified the population and identified improvement opportunities, redesigned multispecialty care coordination pathways across settings, and developed greater ambulatory infrastructure to support care needs. Main Measures Outcomes included utilization of hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient bed days, and 30-day all-cause readmissions. Key Results During the 12 months following intervention implementation, the monthly estimated rate of decline for hospitalizations was 5.4% (95% CI: 3.4–7.4%), which was 3.4 percentage points faster than the 18-month pre-intervention decline of 2.0% (95% CI: 1.0–2.2%) per month ( p = 0.004). Medicare CKD patients’ monthly ED visit rate of decline was 3.0% (95% CI: 1.2–4.8%) after intervention, which was 2.6 percentage points faster than the pre-intervention decline of 0.4% (95% CI: − 0.8 to 1.6%) per month ( p = 0.02). Conclusions By creating care pathways that link primary and specialty care teams across settings with increased ambulatory infrastructure, healthcare systems have potential to reduce inpatient healthcare utilization. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-06272-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

10 Jahre Accountable Care Organizations in den USA: Impulse für Reformen in Deutschland?

“…Zur Qualitätssteigerung fokussieren ACOs auf die Verbesserung der hausärztlichen Versorgung, dem Versorgungsmanagement, der Koordination zwischen den Akteuren sowie die Befähigung der Patienten zum besseren Selbstmanagement 39 90 91 92 93 94 95 . Insbesondere werden populationsspezifische Versorgungsprogramme für Patientengruppen mit chronischen Erkrankungen, schweren Krankheitsverläufen oder hohem Inanspruchnahmeverhalten eingeführt 58 68 96 97 98 .…”

“…Insbesondere werden populationsspezifische Versorgungsprogramme für Patientengruppen mit chronischen Erkrankungen, schweren Krankheitsverläufen oder hohem Inanspruchnahmeverhalten eingeführt 58 68 96 97 98 . Hierfür haben ACOs in datengetriebenes Population Health Management investiert 94 99 100 .…”

Challenges to Shared Decision Making About Treatment of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Clinicians

“…Implementation of a multispecialty team approach may help to clarify patients' competing priorities, overcome care fragmentation and improve patient outcomes for those with advanced CKD. 47,48 This study has several limitations. First, although we utilized purposive sampling to gather diverse patient perspectives on decision-making about treatment of advanced CKD, our findings may be of limited generalizability.…”

Comparison of Acute Health Care Utilization Between Patients Receiving In-Center Hemodialysis and the General Population: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada

“…Fifth, other components of dialysis care may need to be further examined, such as interdialytic time, 6 , 8 dialysis schedule, 8 early pre-dialysis care access, 7 , 33 increased monitoring by health care professionals, infection control strategies related to dialysis access, 34 , 35 remote patient monitoring, 10 and multispecialty care coordination. 36 Sixth, predictive analytics (eg, machine learning) could be used to identify patients at high risk for hospitalization, allowing physicians to preemptively intervene to prevent these patients from being hospitalized. 37 , 38 Seventh, patients receiving in-center hemodialysis commonly require urgent hemodialysis treatments due to fluid overload or high potassium levels and are subsequently sent to the emergency department if the hemodialysis clinic is not open (eg, weekend closures).…”