2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1566303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Analysis of the Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography for Facial Nerve Imaging in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma

Abstract: Surgeons need to visualize the facial nerve reliably in relation to the vestibular schwannoma (VS) in surgical planning. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography has enabled unprecedented in vivo preoperative visualization. We collected data to measure the accuracy of DTI for an accurate location of the nerve in preoperative VS resection planning. A PubMed search for relevant studies was conducted. Inclusion criteria were gross total resection of VS, preoperative DTI identification of the facial nerve, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a 17% accuracy rate was reported by Yoshino et al when standard DTI was used but this increased to 67% when DTI was combined with multifused CE-FIESTA images (Yoshino et al, 2015a). Excluding these results, the success rate of generating cranial nerve tractography in patients with a posterior fossa tumor rises to 82–100%, similar to that reported by Ung et al in their brief review of the literature (Ung et al, 2016); however, intraoperative accuracy remains inconsistent (30–100%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Similarly, a 17% accuracy rate was reported by Yoshino et al when standard DTI was used but this increased to 67% when DTI was combined with multifused CE-FIESTA images (Yoshino et al, 2015a). Excluding these results, the success rate of generating cranial nerve tractography in patients with a posterior fossa tumor rises to 82–100%, similar to that reported by Ung et al in their brief review of the literature (Ung et al, 2016); however, intraoperative accuracy remains inconsistent (30–100%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Four studies (among the 18 with data applicable to our analysis) were not ultimately considered in our analysis. One study (Ung et al 21 ) was a systematic analysis of FN DTI tractography studies that had been conducted in 2015 and included 3 studies. Another study (Chen et al 3 ) analyzed DTI for tracking the cranial nerves in VS but did not test the reliability of the results as compared with intraoperative findings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,19,20 In the past few years, there have been an increasing number of studies, which use diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to analyze the spatial relationship of the FN to the tumor. [39][40][41][42] While DTI may provide a detailed analysis of the risk for FN injury, it is susceptible to error. The A/P index provides a simple tool, which can be readily calculated on standard MRI to provide meaningful FN risk assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%