2011
DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2011.572702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic approach for evaluating port effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The way to proceed towards a holistic approach is to take into account port users in port effectiveness evaluation. Most port performance measurement schemes fail to include this performance component (Brooks et al, 2011). Consequently, measuring port performance is heavily relied on operational efficiency measures (Pallis and Vitsounis, 2009) resulting in a gap between port performance and port users' expectations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way to proceed towards a holistic approach is to take into account port users in port effectiveness evaluation. Most port performance measurement schemes fail to include this performance component (Brooks et al, 2011). Consequently, measuring port performance is heavily relied on operational efficiency measures (Pallis and Vitsounis, 2009) resulting in a gap between port performance and port users' expectations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main aim of this study is to address this gap in the OE research in two ways, first it validates the OE factors from the literature review in the seaport context and second, it identifies new OE factors relevant to the seaport sector. The Delphi method is applied to allow the study to Customer satisfaction Sayareh (2006), Elmuti, Jia and Gray (2009), Sayareh (2009), Cetin and Cerit (2010), Brooks, Schellinck, and Pallis (2011) investigate the subject matter in depth and to identify the critical OE factors through an iterative process of interviewing and surveying participants from the Saudi Arabian seaport sector as a case study.…”
Section: The Oil Company Seaportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inconsistency among statistical evaluation indicators of different ports may also be observed [24]. In recent years, several multiattribute decision-making methods have been adopted for port efficiency or performance evaluation; these methods include fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, quality function deployment, and fuzzy analytic network process [27][28][29][30][31]. Although these methods are flexible and easy to use, the appropriate evaluation indicators are difficult to design, and the interference between indicators may be considerable.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%