A Systematic Comparison of IoT Middleware

Held, Florian; Philipp, Schauz,; Domaschka, Jörg

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04718-3_5

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies that have already appeared have underlined the beneficial effects that the IoT can play in connection with central topics of the digital market such as Inventory management, Supply chain management, and Personalization based on consumer preferences (Manogaran et al, 2021). ThingsBoard has features suitable for providing support in each of these application areas (Held et al, 2022). So, we can say that it is just a matter of time before papers proposing its adoption to those fields will appear.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the five papers classified as Basic research, ThingsBoard is used either for comparison with other IoT platforms (Ismail et al, 2018;Held et al, 2022;Ottolini et al, 2022), to implement the theory presented in the study (Carratù et al, 2021), or to introduce a blockchain authentication scheme tailored for ThingsBoard (Jang et al, 2021). In the four papers classified as General purpose, ThingsBoard is used either to build an environment that provides automation with a security layer of Blockchain technology (Pal et al, 2023), to set up an IoT architecture suitable to implement generic IoT applications (Kiran et al, 2020), as the cloud IoT platform in the design and implementation of an opensource IoT-based SCADA system (Aghenta and Iqbal, 2019), or as cloud IoT platform for implementing a generic IoT monitoring system (Scott and Eleyan, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Item ID Bestari and Wibowo (2023); Ismail et al (2018); Abdulbaqi and Hashim (2023); Sabuncu and Thornton (2022); Held et al (2022); Huhs et al (2023); Ilyas et al (2021); Casillo et al Hamza et al (2023); Maksimović and Ćosović (2022)…”

Section: Acknowledgmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Papers Mentioning Things Board: A Systematic Mapping Study

Di Felice,

Paolone

2024

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a previous article, we conducted a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) devoted to identifying the open-source IoT platform that nowadays offers the most features as well as adequate documentation and which, therefore, is a useful middleware in the development of IoT applications. In light of the final findings of such a study, ThingsBoard was selected. The present paper reports on the findings of a subsequent mapping study. We queried the Scopus database looking for articles that mention ThingsBoard either in the Title, in the Abstract, or among the authors' Keywords. 55 items were retrieved and carefully read. At the end of this stage, we were able to answer the following research questions: Are there available studies mentioning ThingsBoard? In which ambits? What is the role of ThingsBoard in the studies where it is mentioned? What are the gaps in current research and the implications for future research? The study goals are general, so the final findings might be of interest to IoT professionals, as well as to scholars. In detail, the SMS provides insights into the breadth of usage and the domains where ThingsBoard has been applied successfully, indicating its suitability and potential for a wide range of IoT-related projects. Moreover, a few gaps to be filled with further research have emerged.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Papers Mentioning Things Board: A Systematic Mapping Study

Di Felice,

Paolone

2024

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This paper analyses the performance offered by these two most popular protocols for the application layer: Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) and Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT). This analysis aims to examine the features and capabilities of the two protocols and to determine their feasibility to operate under constrained devices taking into account security support and diverse network conditions, unlike the previous works [11].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of automatic medical internet of things system (MIoT) for robotic surgery with multi-protocol approach using COAP and MQTT protocols

Deshpande¹,

Jogdand²

2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern medical devices serving as blessings to patients worldwide as IoT systems are becoming pillar for healthcare professionals. IoT research is growing in the direction of automation of patient care systems to automation of robotic surgeries. Industrial IoT is serving numerous sectors like medical, agriculture, manufacturing and many more sectors. Hence, this paper presents the architecture for medical device sensors and devices which can be automated for fast response to incoming IoT protocol. We developed the multiprotocol communication approach where CoAP and MQTT protocols can respond to medical system control panel request by extracting the common message parameters. This can be helpful for several medical systems which need automation and quick response systems can be developed using proposed approach.

show abstract

“…A user-defined function can be applied to produce a measurement that applications can use by sending a query to a database where the sensor data is stored. Held et al [11] highlighted the following IoT characteristics relevant for middleware: 1) Scalability, 2) Heterogeneity, 3) self-configuration, 4) self-discovering, 5) self-processing, 5) Everything-as-a-Service, and 6) Security.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%