2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic comparison of metamodeling techniques for simulation optimization in Decision Support Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
95
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such values derive from both previous studies [9,50,51] and from some tests preliminarily performed by the authors in order to obtain a satisfactory compromise between the computational burden and the reliability of the results. …”
Section: Parameters Of the Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such values derive from both previous studies [9,50,51] and from some tests preliminarily performed by the authors in order to obtain a satisfactory compromise between the computational burden and the reliability of the results. …”
Section: Parameters Of the Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of meta-modeling methods can be found in the literature (Jin et al 2001, Li et al 2010. Most popular among them are, response surface methods, artificial neural networks, multivariate adaptive regression splines, kriging, radial basis functions and support vector regression.…”
Section: Meta-modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent studies over SO methods can be found in two books Kleijnen, 2015) and four review papers (Barton, 1992;Carson & Maria, 1997;Li et al, 2010;Simpson, Poplinski et al, 2001). In general, SO models can be divided into two types of stochastic and deterministic models (Fig.…”
Section: Simulation-optimization (So)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the stochastic nature of the simulation model, repeated runs of the simulation model with the same combination of input variables, lead to different outputs. Typically, as the training set to improve the metamodel, the average magnitude of repeated runs can be used (Li et al, 2010). If the stochastic simulation models is followed, each input combination , 1,2, … , is repeated times ( 1,2, .…”
Section: Robust Optimization In the Class Of Dual Responsementioning
confidence: 99%