A Systematic Consideration of Observational Design Decisions in the Theory Construction Process

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop an explicit protocol for gaining the use of new concepts from external and transdisciplinary sources during the theory construction process. We are concerned with Churchman's ‘sweeping in’ of alternative perspectives and with inductive research. The potential for innovation that concepts from external disciplines bring is balanced by the risks of working outside a researcher's area of expertise. There is potential for researcher bias when gathering new ideas as well as when filtering possible new theory, and a protocol might help minimize such problems. For example, few business researchers are fully versed in ecology, and vice versa. This applies to the authors here, but we look at the issue from our respective sides and bring our respective expertise. Hierarchy theory is fundamentally a theory of observation. Here it helps us to define how the perspective of the researcher affects theory construction and the use of transdisciplinary concepts. It introduces a precision about the use of levels and brings out the dualism that arises in movement between levels. We use this to develop a theoretical model of the theory‐building process that avoids bias whilst making best use of the researcher's preconceptions. We illustrate our protocol using the business ecosystem metaphor, which is common in the business literature. Our special case that straddles business and ecology might offer guidance in other transdisciplinary efforts. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Evaluating and understanding the outcomes of the South African National Drug Master Plan 2013–2017: A systems‐based integrative propositional analysis application

“…However, best guess, reasons, intuition or assumptions could prove difficult to evaluate as they are of the page and so not accessible as the printed text. From a conceptual science perspective, good policies (in this sense, ones that reach their goals) are those with ‘an internal logic that interrelates the conceptual elements’ (Shaw & Allen, 2012: 486).…”

The missing piece of the integrative studies puzzle

“…In short, advancing theory in the social sciences has been a primarily intuitive endeavour (Meehl 2002). While those kinds of efforts at integration may be based on careful thinking and deep understanding by experts, they often end up seemingly eclectic (Clark et al 2011), producing perspectives that are more multidisciplinary instead of being fully interdisciplinary, highlighting the difficulty of building useful theory when using non-systematic methods (Shaw and Allen 2012). With a more formal, more structured approach to integration we might expect to accelerate and improve the process of integration to develop better theories to resolve the highly complex problems we face more effectively.…”

“…Disessa 2002; Shoemaker, Tankard, and Lasorsa 2004; Özdemir and Clark 2007; Wallis 2008b, 2010b; Edwards 2010); and, on the other hand, by the difficulty of building useful theory when using non-systematic methods (e.g. Shaw and Allen 2012).…”

The Science of Conceptual Systems: A Progress Report

“…Shaw and Allen (2012) note that theory construction becomes problematic when the conceptual components are chosen in a way that is not systematic. In general, those who develop theory, ''rarely build their theories in textbook fashion from the bottom-up.…”