2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic description of MLL fusion gene formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When TOP2-induced DSBs are not faithfully re-ligated, they are susceptible to mutation and genome rearrangements. Indeed, the widely used anti-cancer agent etoposide (ETO), which traps TOP2 in the double-strand cleavage form and thereby prevents ligation, is frequently associated with therapy-related myeloid leukemias (t-AML) following a primary malignancy (Wright and Vaughan, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When TOP2-induced DSBs are not faithfully re-ligated, they are susceptible to mutation and genome rearrangements. Indeed, the widely used anti-cancer agent etoposide (ETO), which traps TOP2 in the double-strand cleavage form and thereby prevents ligation, is frequently associated with therapy-related myeloid leukemias (t-AML) following a primary malignancy (Wright and Vaughan, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the major pathological mechanisms underlying most of these mutations are not fully understood, it is clear that mutations and rearrangements of the MLL family proteins are important in the initiation and maintenance of broad range of cancers. The reader who is further interested in the intricacies of MLL disease mechanisms will find the following references particularly enlightening . Extensive implications of SET1 family of proteins in diseases validate these proteins as potential drug targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous transcription of the mutated DMPK gene and the CTNNB1 gene in cycling hair follicles might be responsible for tissue and gene specificity and could be an explanation for the putative mutation signatures detected in the patient's tumor specimens which suggest a transcriptional mutational bias. In other cancers, co-transcription has been proposed as a mechanism responsible for gene fusions [35]. Simultaneous transcription of DMPK and CTNNB1 resulting in a defect of transcription coupled DNA repair at the CTMNB1 gene could further provide an explanation why no additional mutation could be detected within the other 160 cancer-related genes which were screened by NGS even though the patient obviously displays a hypermutation phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%