2017
DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s140875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic identification of species-specific protein succinylation sites using joint element features information

Abstract: Lysine succinylation, an important type of protein posttranslational modification, plays significant roles in many cellular processes. Accurate identification of succinylation sites can facilitate our understanding about the molecular mechanism and potential roles of lysine succinylation. However, even in well-studied systems, a majority of the succinylation sites remain undetected because the traditional experimental approaches to succinylation site identification are often costly, time-consuming, and laborio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the performance of DeepSuccinylSite was compared with other succinylation site predictors using an independent test set as mentioned in the benchmark dataset earlier. During these analyses, some of the most widely used tools for succinylation site prediction, such as iSuc-PseAAC [8], iSuc-PseOpt [9], pSuc-Lys [10], Suc-cineSite [11], SuccineSite2.0 [12], GPSuc [13] and PSuccE [14], were considered. All these methods use the same training and independent test data sets as in Table 6.…”
Section: Independent Test Comparisons With Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, the performance of DeepSuccinylSite was compared with other succinylation site predictors using an independent test set as mentioned in the benchmark dataset earlier. During these analyses, some of the most widely used tools for succinylation site prediction, such as iSuc-PseAAC [8], iSuc-PseOpt [9], pSuc-Lys [10], Suc-cineSite [11], SuccineSite2.0 [12], GPSuc [13] and PSuccE [14], were considered. All these methods use the same training and independent test data sets as in Table 6.…”
Section: Independent Test Comparisons With Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, machine learning has become a costeffective method for prediction of different PTM sites. Some of the machine learning based succinylation site prediction approaches are iSuc-PseAAC [8], iSuc-PseOpt [9], pSuc-Lys [10], SuccineSite [11], SuccineSite2.0 [12], GPSuc [13] and PSuccE [14] . Although results have been promising, the potential for bias is present due to manual selection of features along with the possible absence of unknown features that contribute to succinylation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the prediction PTM sites, this specific problem is particularly prominent due to the sequence diversity. For instance, some sequence motifs are very weak and not available with the sequence evolutionary information [37][38][39][40][41][42]. To address this problem, we can search PSI-BLAST [32,43,44] against the NCBI NR database to generate a profile (i.e., position-specific scoring matrix [45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Feature For the Computational Prediction Of Lysine Ptm Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…position-speci ic scoring matrix (PSSM)). Such sequence pro iles re lect the conservation and variation between protein sequences through the evolutionary information [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Feature Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%