2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2019.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic investigation of secondary phase dissolution in Mg–Sn alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noticed that the content of Mg 2 Sn particles is much higher than that of MgZn 2 . This is mainly caused by the difference of solid solubility of Sn [ 28 ] and Zn [ 20 ] in Mg. The high‐magnified SEM images show that the strip‐like Mg 2 Sn is broken into granular particles with an average size of 5 μm, which is considered as the result of hot rolling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noticed that the content of Mg 2 Sn particles is much higher than that of MgZn 2 . This is mainly caused by the difference of solid solubility of Sn [ 28 ] and Zn [ 20 ] in Mg. The high‐magnified SEM images show that the strip‐like Mg 2 Sn is broken into granular particles with an average size of 5 μm, which is considered as the result of hot rolling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mg alloys containing Zn or Sn elements, such as Mg-Zn-Sn, Mg-Zn, and Mg-Sn alloys, the second phases usually include MgZn 2 , Mg 4 Zn 7 , Mg 2 Zn 11 , Mg 2 Sn, etc. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In Mg alloys, the Mn element usually forms the α-Mn particles, promotes grain refinement, and improves the corrosion resistance [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%